Answer: She had $61.91,
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
y = 3x - 19
Step-by-step explanation:
Slope-Intercept Form: y = mx + b
Step 1: Define variables
Slope <em>m</em> = 3
Random point (5, -4)
Step 2: Plug in known variables
y = 3x + b
Step 3: Find <em>b</em>
-4 = 3(5) + b
-4 = 15 + b
b = -19
Step 4: Write linear equation
y = 3x - 19
Answer:
Here's what we know:
A = Lw (Area is length times width)
L = 2w + 6 (length is twice the width plus 6)
A = 140 (Area is 140 m2)
Plug in the variable values:
140 = w(2w + 6)
Distribute:
140 = 2w2 + 6w
Subtract 140:
2w2 + 6w - 140 = 0
Factor out a 2:
2(w2 + 3w - 70) = 0
Divide both sides by 2:
w2 + 3w - 70 = 0
(w + m)(w - n)
When we factor out the quadratic, we know it's going to be a +/- situation because the c value in the quadratic is negative, and the two numbers are going to be three away, the plus next to the 3 meaning that the larger number is going to be positive:
(w + 10)(w - 7) = 0
w = -10, 7
We can't have a negative length, so we can toss out the -10, leaving us with w = 7 meters.
L = 2 * 7 + 6
L = 14 + 6
L = 20
Check:
140 = 20 * 7
140 = 140
Answer: Phillip is correct. The triangles are <u>not </u>congruent.
How do we know this? Because triangle ABC has the 15 inch side between the two angles 50 and 60 degrees. The other triangle must have the same set up (just with different letters XYZ). This isn't the case. The 15 inch side for triangle XYZ is between the 50 and 70 degree angle.
This mismatch means we cannot use the "S" in the ASA or AAS simply because we don't have a proper corresponding pair of sides. If we knew AB, BC, XZ or YZ, then we might be able to use ASA or AAS.
At this point, there isn't enough information. So that means John and Mary are incorrect, leaving Phillip to be correct by default.
Note: Phillip may be wrong and the triangles could be congruent, but again, we don't have enough info. If there was an answer choice simply saying "there isn't enough info to say either if the triangles are congruent or not", then this would be the best answer. Unfortunately, it looks like this answer is missing. So what I bolded above is the next best thing.
