When Europeans began the colonization of Central and South America, they began producing agricultural products such as sugar, molasses, and cassava. When this economic activity grew the Europeans began relying on primarily slave labor. The best answer choice for this question is B.
The reason why the Catholic Church opposed the Scientific Revolution was that they c. could have caused changes in the way the masses thought about science and the creation of life and the world.
<h3 /><h3>Why was the Church against the Scientific Revolution?</h3>
The Scientific Revolution brought with it new theories on how the world functioned such as the Earth rotating around the sun instead of it being the other way around.
The Church was worried that people would start to think about creation and the world in ways that weren't in line with the church and so opposed it.
Find out more on the Scientific Revolution at brainly.com/question/2074895.
#SPJ1
Answer: Hobbes believed people were naturally selfish and violent.
<u>Further explanation</u>:
Both English philosophers believed there is a "social contract" -- that governments are formed by the will of the people. But their theories on why people want to live under governments were very different.
Thomas Hobbes published his political theory in <em>Leviathan </em> in 1651, following the chaos and destruction of the English Civil War. He saw human beings as naturally suspicious of one another, in competition with each other, and evil toward one another as a result. Forming a government meant giving up personal liberty, but gaining security against what would otherwise be a situation of every person at war with every other person.
John Locke published his <em>Two Treatises on Civil Government </em>in 1690, following the mostly peaceful transition of government power that was the Glorious Revolution in England. Locke believed people are born as blank slates--with no preexisting knowledge or moral leanings. Experience then guides them to the knowledge and the best form of life, and they choose to form governments to make life and society better.
In teaching the difference between Hobbes and Locke, I've often put it this way. If society were playground basketball, Hobbes believed you must have a referee who sets and enforces rules, or else the players will eventually get into heated arguments and bloody fights with one another, because people get nasty in competition that way. Locke believed you could have an enjoyable game of playground basketball without a referee, but a referee makes the game better because then any disputes that come up between players have a fair way of being resolved. Of course, Hobbes and Locke never actually wrote about basketball -- a game not invented until 1891 in America by James Naismith. But it's just an illustration I've used to try to show the difference of ideas between Hobbes and Locke. :-)
Answer:
That cultural, political,scientific and intellectual explosion in Europe between the 14th and 17th centuries.
