How far would you let the government go in examining people's private lives depends on the situation at hand. When it comes to sexual incidents and murder allegations, I think it's appropriate for states to share their crime databases. These are cases that the public should be aware of because it's not every time someone walks out or gets paroled for something and never commits that crime again.
As for other crimes, I see no reason to share this. It can cause problems for the person's self-development. I also think it crosses the line of abusing power to access this information. The concept of trading privacy for security makes sense when used for legitimate purposes, but it's always gone too far and distorts your view of what it means to trade privacy for security.
Know more about privacy here
brainly.com/question/1145825
#SPJ4
Answer:
In archaeology, seriation is a relative dating method in which assemblages or artifacts from numerous sites in the same culture are placed in chronological order.
Explanation:
Answer:
Explanation:
Raw material extraction and processing always impact on the environment, resulting as they do in soil degradation, water shortages, biodiversity loss, damage to ecosystem functions and global warming exacerbation.
Answer:
scarty of food
Explanation:
b/c there were so many people.
