For the answer to the question above,
<span>the lowest value you expect at the end of the year is<u><em> $4,000
</em></u><u><em /></u><em />I hope my answer helped you. Have a nice day ahead!<u><em>
</em></u></span>
Answer:
$860,400
Explanation:
Cholla, Inc.’s
Cost of goods sold = Beginning inventory + Purchases − Ending inventory
Purchases = Cost of Goods Sold − Beginning Inventory + Ending Inventory
Cost of Goods Sold $801,000
Less Beginning Inventory ($77,400 )
$723,600
Add Ending Inventory $ 136,800
Amount of inventory purchased $860,400
Therefore the amount of inventory that was purchased during the year was $860,400.
Mean while the consignment inventory is not owned by the company and is not as well considered in the Cost of Goods Sold equation.
Answer:
The ansewr is a barter based economy.
In a barter based economy, goods are exchanged for other goods, because no good that takes the functions of money exists (unit of account, store of value, and medium of exchange).
Barter economies can work on a limited scope, but to a larger extent, they can become inefficient, because this type of economy requires a double coincidence of wants: both parties of the transaction must desire the other party's goods.
Answer:
Kindly check explanation
Explanation:
Given that :
Initial wealth = $1000
Cost of lottery = $5
Winning = $500
Number of players or tickets = 100
Only one winner can emerge :
P(winning) = 1/100
P(Not winning) = 1 - 1/100 = 99/100
P __ 1/100 _________ 99/100
X : [1000 + (500-5)] ___ (1000-5)
P(X): ____1/100 _______ 99/100
X : _____ 1495 _________995
Expected value E(x) :
E(X) = ΣX*p(x) = (1/100)*1495 + (99/100)*995 = 1000
C.)
Possible winning = $500 ; p(x) = 1/100
Possible loss = - 5 ;p(x) = 99/100
500 * (1/100) = 5
-5 * (99/100) = - 4.95
Σ(5 + - 4.95) = 5 - 4.95 = 0.05
Hence, gamble is favorable since 0.05 > 0
Answer:
<em>The solution is explained in the explanation section below</em>
Explanation:
Solution:
(a) <em>In the economy there exist 100 workers. the wage of reservation to take risky job for worker 1 is $1 and $2 for worker -2. only 10 jobs is seen as risky.</em>
<em>The curve of supply is shown as upward which starts from 1, because the price of reservation for the first worker is 1 and 2 is for the second worker and it keeps going on like that.</em>
<em>The demand curve is seen as elastic in a perfect form, due to the fact that there are only 10 risky jobs.</em>
<em>The 10th worker price is $10, because is wage differential is $10</em>
<em>(b) The worker's altitude towards taking risky jobs has changed, because of the advertisement. the wage reservation is -10$ for the first worker and -$9 for the second worker.</em>
<em>Th jobs seen as risky is available are only 10</em>
<em>However, as a result of the campaign advertisement, the curve of supply moves down and the market equilibrium gets is gotten when the wage differential is -$1. most people on the daily basis dislike risk, but the market determines those risky jobs that will pay less than the safe ones. </em>
