Answer:
commission to both brokers N and K.
Explanation:
Broker N is entitled to a sales commission because he/she sold the property. But broker K is also entitled to a commission because an exclusive right-to-sell agreement allows him/her to collect a commission no matter who sells the property. The only exception to the agreement would be if the seller himself/herself sold the property, but that is not the case here.
Answer:
C, a decrease in the real interest rate
Explanation:
When factors such as changes in expectation, technology, demands for goods and services, etc cause in shift in the demand curve for capital, interest rates act as the determinant of the capital demand.
If the interest rates of loans are high, capital demand will be reduced but in the event that interest rates are low, capital demand is high or increases.
Cheers
Answer:
Sunk costs.
Explanation:
Sunk costs refers to historical funds spent or incurred that cannot be recovered. Such costs are considered irrelevant during decision making which impacts on the business's future as they present no influence on present or future prospects.
Example
ABC investors decide to acquire land and develop residential houses at a location X. This decision is informed on the fact that the government had recently enacted a policy that led to an increase in demand for residential properties in that location. 6 months into construction of the residential houses, the government reviews and rescinds the policy. This leads to a sharp decline in property values in location X. ABC investors had already incurred 10 million dollars in the project. The 10 million dollars is considered sunk cost.
Sunk costs are the opposite of relevant costs because they can't be changed or recovered, as they've been spent or contracted in the past already. Hence, relevant cost are relevant for decision-making purposes but not sunk costs.
Hence, money that has been or will be paid regardless of the decision whether to proceed with the project is sunk costs.
Answer:
The Cash paid to suppliers was $85,000
Explanation:
Data provided in the question:
Cost of goods sold = $100,000
Decrease in inventory = $5,000
Increase in accounts payable = $10,000
Now,
Cash paid to suppliers will be
= Cost of goods sold - Decrease in inventory - Increase in accounts payable
= $100,000 - $5,000 - $10,000
= $85,000
Hence,
The Cash paid to suppliers was $85,000
Answer:
the answer is option D)<u>Equal sharing of the bill ensures that people order a similar dollar amount of food</u>
Explanation:
The theory of consumer behavior states that "consumers allocate incomes among different goods and services to maximize their utility"
Consumer behavior revolves around three parameters their preferences, budget constraints, and options available.
The budget constraint will definitely influence the choice of what to buy within the options available to maximize utility. That means how the bill is shared among the three friends will ultimately affect how much they will chose to eat.
Secondly, The vegetarian will not be better off with equal sharing of the bill because the cost of his food according to the data provided is less.
We don not know for sure if the wine drinker drinks too much or whether he will want his other friends to foot the extra bill from the cost of his wine but we are certain that equal sharing of the bill ensures that people order a similar dollar amount of food.
