This question is incomplete; here is the complete question:
Fourteen-year-old Jean-Claude, an avid video game player, reads a flawed study showing that video game players are smarter than most people. Then he reads a second study with similar flaws proposing that video game players are poor leaders. What would you predict will happen:
A. He would dismiss the findings of the first study and overlook the flaws in the second study.
B. He would now believe that video game players are poor leaders.
C. He would overlook the flaws in the first study and dismiss the findings of the second study.
D. He would now believe that video game players are both smarter and poor leaders.
The correct answer to this question is C. He would overlook the flaws in the first study and dismiss the findings of the second study.
Explanation:
In general, individuals tend to favor information that supports their points of view or preferences, this is a type of cognitive bias known as confirmation bias. Additionally, this is a type of bias because individuals do not consider objectively whether the information is accurate or reliable. This is likely to occur in the case of Jean-Claude because even when the studies are flawed it is likely he supports the first study that shows video game players are smarter. After all, this supports his beliefs and preferences. Moreover, he might dismiss the findings of the second study that is opposite to his preferences.
Answer:
NGSS stands for Next Generation Science Standards
HS stands for High School
PS Postscript
Explanation: hope this helps!!
Answer:
https://www.eiu.edu/historia/Thoele.pdf
Explanation: In there you will find the answer you need(there are multiple)
D. Thales i know because of the solar eclipse
Answer:
b. a horizontal restraint of trade.
Explanation:
This would be an example of a horizontal restraint of trade. Horizontal restraint of trade is an agreement between competitors at the same level of distribution, producing similar goods for the purpose of fixing product price, bid rigging, market allocation, group boycotts or any other purpose that will influence the market to their favour and minimize competition between them.