<span>The overhead movements often used as part of integration techniques because it helps to place increased stress on the core musculature.
Generally competitors or athletes will utilize overhead squeezing movements to enhance shoulder strength. We additionally observe a great deal of mentors utilizing the Overhead Squat Movements for an assortment of reasons. Both are awesome activities, when the competitor has the proper measure of Thoracic Spine Extension. Shockingly, if the Thoracic Spine is bolted up and missing some genuinely necessary expansion, the shoulders won't have the capacity to do a significant part of crafted by keeping the weight overhead. Something different should fill in.
</span>
I think it’s b but I can’t garauntee I’m sorry
Answer:
Current price of the bond $928.95
Explanation:
Th price of the bond is the same as the present value of the bond today which is given by the below excel formula:
=pv(rate,nper,pmt,fv)
rate is the yield to maturity on the bond of 8.6%
nper is the tenor of the bond which is 25 years
pmt is the coupon interest payable annually by the bond which is 7.9%*1000=79
fv is the future value repayable on redemption which is 1000 euros
=pv(8.6%,25,79,-1000)
pv=$928.95
The current price of the bond is $928.95 as computed using the present value formula in excel
Answer:
One behavioral bias that might explain why Schlicksup was prepared to take the risk of blowing the whistle in this case is Reducing Regrets.
Explanation:
The only sin of Schlicksup was that he "was an accountant at Arthur Andersen (he auditing firm that was criminally indicted in the Enron scandal and went out of business)." Self-convinced that he was going to get fired from Caterpillar, he then wanted to blow the whistle by 2008, which he should have done before being employed in Caterpillar, anyway. He is surely suffering from the bias of reducing his regrets. This makes him to be emotionally involved and to reach wrong conclusions that might not be based on facts. He did not even ask himself if he was involved directly in the Enron-Arthur Andersen scandal. Even if he was directly involved, has he not expressed remorse for his former actions to enable him to move on in life? Schlicksup is simply going to illogical lengths to avoid having to own the feeling of regret.
Answer:
C) Should Jantel, Inc., follow a product or marketing concept?
Explanation:
The discussion here is that Ethel believes they should follow a product concept while Jan believes they should follow a marketing concept. Well, Jan is right and Ethel has been wrong for more than 100 years.
If Jantel Inc. is going to manufacture or produce some super groundbreaking mega exceptional product that everyone will want to have because of how great it is and how it will dramatically change their lives, then it's OK to follow a make and sell philosophy. That's the only reason why a company should only focus on how good your product is.
But if Jantel Inc. is not inventing something life changing as the iPhone or the PC, then they will have to be more consumer oriented. This has become a universal truth all around the world.
The world is full of thousands of great products that someone wants and needs to sell to you, but you only buy a tiny fraction of them. So as a customer, you decide which product to buy based on the seller's marketing actions.
The only possible exceptions to this rule are commodities, i.e. farmers grow soybeans and corn the best they can simply because someone will be willing to buy all they can produce.
So unless Janitel Inc. is a mining company, a farm or oil company, or Ehtel and Jan are the reincarnations of Steve Jobs, or they can invent a new type of breathable air (or some other super genius product), then they should definitely focus on consumers and marketing.
