Answer: The potential energy stored when the weighted end of the pendulum is paused at one point, it is converted to kinetic once in motion, so when going from one point to the other it becomes kinetic.
Explanation:
The third one. A person uses another's lack of knowledge as proof his argument is correct.
This may be helpful:
https://literarydevices.net/fallacy/
Answer:
You could make an app where people share experiences/situations of hate that they have experienced. The app could be separated into different topics/categories. Racism feminism mental illnesses abuse animal cruelty stress pollution. Since we are all different, people might want to talk about different things. The app could help those who fell alone know that there are other out there who feel the same way. People could find ways to make support groups and connect globally. People could also create events, zooms, parties to create more a awareness to these issues
Explanation:
One more thing, the app could filter negative hot hate comments- I don’t know this is just an idea
Answer:
Hi there,
Explanation:
well, the first source is more credible,why? because based on the principle of proof of argument, it is more credible to refer an article that is governmental published.
Answer:
The answer
Explanation:
A rhetorical question is of course there are those who argue that Hector's numerous other victories make him a candidate for the greatest Trojan. here I use Repetition, But I strongly disagree with this. my Opinions given as fact is Hector's armies led him to victory. I would like imply the applicable imperatives here and declare that Hector hid shamefully behind his soldiers and barely faced battle himself. making use of the emotive language of sheer admiration, being thrilled and feeling immense prouder, not using hyperbole announces that Whereas Paris looked his enemy in the eye like a courageous leader should and offered his life to spare the lives of others. Appealing directly to the reader Did Hector ever make such a selfless offer.
