All categories

2 years ago

Could some give the answers AND a good explanation

Mathematics

1 answer:

soldi70 [24.7K]2 years ago

4 0

Answer:

1.It is B This is because if you put that expression in scientific notation that’s what you will get.

2.It is A This is because you need to take the translation and multiply them equally to get this scientific notation.

Step-by-step explanation:

hope this helped!

You might be interested in

In a study of the accuracy of fast food drive-through orders, McDonald’s had 33 orders that were not accurate among 362 orders o

melomori [17]

Answer:

A. We need to conduct a hypothesis in order to test the claim that the true proportion of inaccurate orders p is 0.1.

B. Null hypothesis: $p=0.1$

Alternative hypothesis: $p \neq 0.1$

C. $z=\frac{0.0912 -0.1}{\sqrt{\frac{0.1(1-0.1)}{362}}}=-0.558$

D. $z_{\alpha/2}=-1.96$ $z_{1-\alpha/2}=1.96$

E. Fail to the reject the null hypothesis

F. So the p value obtained was a very high value and using the significance level given $\alpha=0.05$ we have $p_v>\alpha$ so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis, and we can said that at 5% of significance the true proportion of inaccurate orders is not significantly different from 0.1.

Step-by-step explanation:

Data given and notation

n=362 represent the random sample taken

X=33 represent the number of orders not accurate

$\hat p=\frac{33}{363}=0.0912$ estimated proportion of orders not accurate

$p_o=0.10$ is the value that we want to test

$\alpha=0.05$ represent the significance level

Confidence=95% or 0.95

z would represent the statistic (variable of interest)

$p_v$ represent the p value (variable of interest)

A: Write the claim as a mathematical statement involving the population proportion p

We need to conduct a hypothesis in order to test the claim that the true proportion of inaccurate orders p is 0.1.

B: State the null (H0) and alternative (H1) hypotheses

Null hypothesis: $p=0.1$

Alternative hypothesis: $p \neq 0.1$

When we conduct a proportion test we need to use the z statistic, and the is given by:

$z=\frac{\hat p -p_o}{\sqrt{\frac{p_o (1-p_o)}{n}}}$ (1)

The One-Sample Proportion Test is used to assess whether a population proportion $\hat p$ is significantly different from a hypothesized value $p_o$ .

C: Find the test statistic

Since we have all the info required we can replace in formula (1) like this:

$z=\frac{0.0912 -0.1}{\sqrt{\frac{0.1(1-0.1)}{362}}}=-0.558$

D: Find the critical value(s)

Since is a bilateral test we have two critical values. We need to look on the normal standard distribution a quantile that accumulates 0.025 of the area on each tail. And for this case we have:

$z_{\alpha/2}=-1.96$ $z_{1-\alpha/2}=1.96$

P value

It's important to refresh the p value method or p value approach . "This method is about determining "likely" or "unlikely" by determining the probability assuming the null hypothesis were true of observing a more extreme test statistic in the direction of the alternative hypothesis than the one observed". Or in other words is just a method to have an statistical decision to fail to reject or reject the null hypothesis.

The significance level provided $\alpha=0.05$ . The next step would be calculate the p value for this test.

Since is a bilateral test the p value would be:

$p_v =2*P(z$

E: Would you Reject or Fail to Reject the null (H0) hypothesis.

Fail to the reject the null hypothesis

F: Write the conclusion of the test.

So the p value obtained was a very high value and using the significance level given $\alpha=0.05$ we have $p_v>\alpha$ so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis, and we can said that at 5% of significance the true proportion of inaccurate orders is not significantly different from 0.1.

6 0

3 years ago

Ejejejjejjejjejjjdjdjjjdjjdjjdjjd

skelet666 [1.2K]

Answer:

freeeeeeee pooooooooints

Step-by-step explanation:

thanks I guess?

5 0

3 years ago

Please help please!!!!!!!!!! ILL DO BRAINLIST PLSSS

svlad2 [7]

Answerdancer is 5.6 / 7 from the denominator in a plate holder to you / 62 Daniel divide to play Toda by 76 u x 2 x 36 do your ankles going to be 30 60 you're going to end up with 36 in your answer is going to be 76.30 mm

Step-by-step explanation:

it literally soo ezy

7 0

3 years ago

Find the area of the shaded polygon.

Inessa [10]

Answer:

8 square units

Step-by-step explanation:

Split the polygon into 3 triangles as pictured below

They have base and height:

4 and 3, 1 and 1, 3 and 1

Find the area of 3 triangles and add up:

A = 1/2bh

A = 1/2*4*3 + 1/2*1*1 + 1/2*1*3 = 6 + 1/2 + 3/2 = 8 square units

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Someone help please!!!

Sati [7]

Answer:

y intercept = -5 

slope= 4 

equation: y = 4x - 5

EXPLANATION:

FIRST, you must write the formula for a linear graph , which is y = m(x) + c

where y is any y component and x is it's corresponding x component , m is the gradient or slope and c is the constant or y intercept.

SOLUTION:

y = mx + c

finding the gradient (m)

m = y2 - y1

x2 - x1

=( (-1)-(-5) ) ÷ (1-0)

= -1+5 ÷ 1

= 4

Therefore, the slope is 4

finding the y intercept.

y = 4x + c

in the above equation, I substituted the value I had for the slope or the gradient or m.

SO NOW IM ABOUT TO FIND C

TO FIND C, YOU MUST FIRST PICK A CORRESPONDING Y AND X COMPONENT.

I CHOOSE MY Y = 3 and X = 2

Now I'm going to substitute those values into the formula.

(3) = 4(2) + C

since it's an equation with one variable, no need for simultaneous equations.

3 = 8 + c

3-8 = c

-5 = c

 

SO THATS HOW WE ARRIVED AT -5 AND 4.

 WITH THAT, the equation of the line is y = 4x - 5.

I HOPE IT WAS HELPFUL.

4 0

3 years ago