1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
dlinn [17]
3 years ago
12

How did this supreme court decision affect judicial interpretations of the constitution?.

Law
1 answer:
lisabon 2012 [21]3 years ago
5 0
The Supreme Court's responsibility to overturn unconstitutional legislation was a necessary consequence of its sworn duty to uphold the Constitution.
You might be interested in
Law is a practical discipline; theory has no place in law.with specific references to the law of contact.discuss
Virty [35]

Answer:

This statement is not correct. The law is a practical and theoretical discipline, that is, it is made up of both the application of laws and the different judicial procedures as well as the theoretical content of the laws, which give their clauses sociological and technical support.

Thus, the different theories of law are applied by legislators when drafting a law, and those same theories are used by congressmen when debating whether or not to approve those laws.

In addition, theories are also used in other areas of law, such as criminal law, where doctrine and jurisprudence develop and adapt theories to different judicial situations. For example, the theory of law by which detainees must know their rights before declaring, the Miranda Warning, arises from a theory developed by the Supreme Court under an interpretation of the Fifth Amendment.

8 0
3 years ago
Listed the evidence that led you to believe Angela was guilty?
Darya [45]

Answer:

Explanation:

I hope this help

4 0
3 years ago
The interpretation of the laws is the proper and peculiar province of the courts. A constitution is, in fact, and must be regard
Deffense [45]

Answer: B

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Can someone give ma an argument from the Tinker v. Des moines court case.
Alinara [238K]

Answer:

In a 7-2 choice, the Supreme Court's larger part ruled that not one or the other understudies nor instructors “shed their sacred rights to opportunity of discourse or expression at the school building gate.” The Court took the position that school authorities seem not deny as it were on the doubt that the discourse might disturb the learning

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
How many sessions are there within each term of congress?
Artyom0805 [142]

Answer: There are 2 session

7 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • in my government class i have a question that asks what general limitation is placed on individual rights
    13·1 answer
  • -Driving his sport utility vehicle negligently, Bart crashes into a streetlight.
    9·2 answers
  • Why does bryan Stevenson
    6·1 answer
  • Congress shall have power ... [to make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution
    10·1 answer
  • When there is a
    9·1 answer
  • What is justice? Write an essay of up to 250 words.
    11·1 answer
  • Wairimu aged 17 years entered into an agreement with Patel in which Wairimu agreed to supply Patel with old Jerry cans for recyc
    8·1 answer
  • Discuss how reserve officers could be a benefit to investigative work.
    9·1 answer
  • If you were given a speeding violation and told to report to court for a hearing, who would be MOST likely to be listening to yo
    6·1 answer
  • Which of these energy transformations is talking place in the kelp as it carries our photosynthesis?
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!