Structural would be the answer if that’s what you’re looking for.
According to Rousseau, the person is only learning to rely on the larger community for answers .
The Social Contract of Rousseau
According to Rousseau, if a person (the minority) refuses to abide by the social compact or general will (the majority) through the use of their own particular will, it must imply that they are unable to make moral decisions on their own and require the assistance of the collective in order to join the social compact and conform to the general will, as the general will signifies what is best for everyone, leading to the phrase "to be forced to be free." In other words, Rousseau completely trusts his idea of the general will since he thinks that the common good pertains to the entire community rather than just one specific characteristic of an individual.
to know more about rousseau's concept of individualism
brainly.com/question/1464644
#SPJ4
Answer:
D
Explanation:
Pure competition means *many* companies/people are going at it for the same/identical thing. C would have been a good answer if it wasn't only two companies.
Answer:
C.
Explanation:
Well, they're called Romance languages because they originated in the Roman Empire. The RE's native toungue was Latin.
Answer: A. A confirmation bias
Explanation: Since Maribel is already convinced that the defendant is not guilty, she seeks proof, or rather, confirmation of her opinion, feeling, conviction, etc. That is why she carefully listens to what the defense lawyer has to say, while paying less attention to the prosecutor's statement. This means that Maribel has a certain bias towards the accused and seeks confirmation of her bias, that is, her conviction that the accused is not guilty.
The term confirmation bias in psychology means favouring information that confirms one's opinion (bias), while ignoring information that states the opposite. This means that confirmation bias is, in fact, a kind of cognitive bias, because Maribel has already cognitively perceived (decided) the accused for some reason not guilty, although may exists evidence to the contrary.
