<em>Cierto
</em>
<em>Solo depende del tipo de teléfono que se utilice para enviar el documento. Creo que hay algunos teléfonos que se configuran más como computadoras que te permiten enviar documentos. Sin embargo, hay muchos teléfonos que no cuentan con esta función y es probable que la mayoría de los teléfonos celulares que usa la gente en la actualidad no realicen esta acción.</em>
<em>Espero que esto te ayude y que tengas un buen día.</em>
<em>-R3TR0 Z3R0</em>
COMPLETE PROBLEM
Lana, a ten-year-old child, is run over by a car negligently driven by Mitchell. Lana, at the time of the accident, was acting reasonably and without negligence. Clark, a newspaper reporter, photographs Lana while she is lying in the street in great pain. Two years later, Perry, the publisher of a newspaper, prints Clark's picture of Lana in his newspaper as a lead to an article concerning the negligence of children. The caption under the picture reads: "They ask to be killed." Lana, who has recovered from the accident, brings suit against Clark and Perry. What result? Explain.
Explanation:
Judgement for Lana against Perry but not against Clark. The facts make out a case against Perry for the tort of invasion of privacy in particular placing another in a false light (INVASION OF PRIVACY:FALSE LIGHT). Section 652E of the restatement imposes liability for publicity which places another in a false light. It is unlikely that Perry could utilize the first amendment as a defense because Lana was neither a public official nor a public figure. Even if that defense were available, it is forfeited if Perry acted with "malice", which appears to be the case here because Perry acted in reckless disregard of the truth. Clark did not commit the tort of intrusion because he photographed an event that occurred in public.
Answer: Statement 1 ( Laptop) = Producer surplus
Statement 2 ( watch ) = Neither
Statement 3 ( jersey sweater) = Consumer surplus
Explanation:
Hi, Consumer surplus happens when the price that consumers pay for a product or service is less than the price they're willing to pay.
- <em>Even though I was willing to pay up to $46 for a jersey sweater, I bought a jersey sweater for only $39. </em>Consumer surplus
Producer surplus<em> </em> is measured as the difference between what producers are willing and able to supply a good for and the price they actually receive
-
<em> I sold a used laptop for $149, even though I was willing to go as low as $140
.</em>Producer surplus
- <em>I sold a watch for $59 on eBay last week. This week, someone offered me $145 for it. </em>neither
Feel free to ask for more if needed or if you did not understand something.
Answer:
0.60
Explanation:
The midpoint formula is used to calculate elasticity by using average percentage in both price and quantity.
The formula is given below:
Percentage change in quantity =<u> (Q2 -Q1) </u> x 100
(Q2 + Q1) / 2
Percentage change in price = <u> (P2 -P1) </u> x 100
(P2 + P1) / 2
Elasticity =<u> Percentage change in price__</u>
Percentage change in quantity
Inserting the data:
Percentage change in quantity =<u> (30 -20) </u> x 100 = <u>10</u> x 100 = 40%
(30 + 20) /2 25
Percentage change in price = <u>($20 - $10)</u> x 100 = <u>10</u> x 100 = 66.6%
($20 + $10) /2 15
Elasticity of supply = <u>40%</u>
66.6%
= 0.60
Answer:
The tax consequences of the distribution to Montclair in 20X3 would be a $150,000 gain recognized and a reduction in E&P of $175,000.
Explanation:
The distribution company distinguishes profit on the distribution, which is included in E&P netting of tax and decreases E&P by rhe lands fair market value fewer the liability believed by the shareholders.
Therefore, The tax consequences of the distribution to Montclair in 20X3 would be a $150,000 gain recognized and a reduction in E&P of $175,000.
