We need to see the article to give the best answer, but the closest choice would be <u>D.</u>
Giving both sides of the story is one way to avoid bias (aka favoring) toward one side.
Answer: <em>Option (D) is correct.</em>
Explanation:
<em>In the following scenario, the organization have wasted time and resources on IT functions when they should have instead worked on factors such as marketing, customer service, and new product design. </em>
<em>If they would've used Outsourcing, they would've been able to work on their core instruments. Outsourcing is referred to as an contract in where one organization hires another to be culpable for a planned enterprise that is done internally, or often implicates carrying over individuals and assets from one organization to another.</em>
Answer:
<u>to pay for road improvements</u>
Explanation:
Remember, the term municipal bonds basically refers to a special kind of loan issued to a local government by its citizens or investors and<em> meant to be used by the government to fund public projects such as road construction, hospitals, and other forms of infrastructure that benefit the general public.</em>
Therefore, the city would most likely use these funds to pay for road improvements as this would benefit the general public.
Answer:
$54,000
Explanation:
The computation of the reported cost of goods manufactured is shown below:
We know that
Cost of goods manufactured = Ending finished goods inventory + cost of goods sold - beginning finished goods inventory
= $19,000 + $49,000 - $14,000
= $54,000
We simply added the inventory of finished goods and subtract the inventory of finished goods from the cost of the sold goods.
Answer:
b. 4.0 years.
Explanation:
The computation of the estimated payback period is given below:
The annual cash inflow is
= Net Income + Depreciation of equipment
= $6000 + $6000
= $12,000
Now The payback period of this investment is
= Investment ÷ Annual cash inflow
= $48,000 ÷ $12,000
= 4 years
hence, the option b is correct and the same should be considered