Mainly yes, but some courts feel as if the calling for the case if for something that happened that was illegal, than the judges/courts feel more justified when explaining what that person did wrong in his or her calling.
Answer: Cramped
Explanation: took the test, said it was right.
Which of the following is the best example of peripheral route persuasion?
A. anti-smoking advertisements that rely on celebrity spokespeople advocating for reduction in cigarette use
B. anti-smoking advertisements that use charts and graphs to show how many people die from smoking-related causes each year
C. encouraging your parents to quit smoking by switching to chewing tobacco, then convincing them to chew less tobacco each week
D. supporting your sister who has decided to go cold turkey in order to quit smoking
Answer: A. anti-smoking advertisements that rely on celebrity spokespeople advocating for reduction in cigarette use
Hope this helps!
Answer:
I am not sure because it's it's not my language
To solve your problem, we can apply Newton's second law of motion.
Fⁿ = ma
<span>Fnet = net force acting on the skier </span>
<span>m = mass of the skier = 53 kg </span>
<span>a = acceleration up the slope </span>
<span>Since velocity is constant then acceleration is zero, hence the above equation becomes </span>
<span>Fnet = 0 </span>
<span>Fnet = F - Wx - f </span>
<span>where </span>
<span>F = force exerted by the tow bar </span>
<span>Wx = component of skier's weight parallel to the incline = 53(9.8)(sin 20) </span>
<span>f = frictional force = 0.160(53)(9.8)(cos 20) </span>
<span>Substituting appropriate values, </span>
<span>F - 53(9.8)(sin 20) - 0.160(53)(9.8)(cos 20) = 0 </span>
<span>and solving for F, </span>
<span>F = 99.55 N </span>
<span>Hope this helps and have a nice day!</span>
