To study and better the enviorment
Answer:
Project A
Years Cashflows Discount factor Present values
0 250,000 1 -250,000
1-10 45,100 6.144 277,094.40
Sum of all present value=NPV=27,094.40
IRR (by using trial and error method) = 12.4696%
Note: Discount factor for the year 1-10 is calculated by using annuity formula i.e [1-(1+10%)]/10% = 6.144
Project B
Years Cashflows Discount factor Present values
0 (350,000) 1 (350,000)
1 72,500 0.91 65,975
2 65,500 0.83 54,365
3 73,800 0.75 55,350
4 71,500 0.68 48,620
5 69,800 0.62 43,276
6 75,500 0.56 42,280
7 31,000 0.51 15,810
8 47,500 0.47 22,325
9 55,500 0.42 23,310
10 29,200 0.38 11,096
Sum of all present values=NPV=32,407
IRR(by using trial and error method=12.4186%
On the basis of NPV project B is better because it gives higher NPV than project A. Whereas, Project A is better than project B on the basis of IRR because project A has slightly higher IRR than project B.
b)The conflict between both the investment appraisal technique is likely due to different cash flow patterns of both the project. In such situation decision should be based on NPV because this is an absolute measure
Answer:
amount of net sales = $1370,000
so correct option is b. $1,370,000
Explanation:
given data
Increase in Accounts Receivable = $370,000
Cash Received = $1 million
to find out
amount of net sales
solution
we get here amount of net sales that is express as
amount of net sales = Cash Received + Increase in Accounts Receivable .............1
put here value we get
amount of net sales = $1000000 + $370,000
amount of net sales = $1370,000
so correct option is b. $1,370,000
Because taxes keep some of the original impact of the tax, unlike spending multipliers, the spending multiplier is always one bigger than the tax multiplier. Any changes in consumer spending that follow any real GDP expansion or contraction brought on by the application of fiscal policy are referred to as the multiplier impact.
Any shift in aggregate demand will typically be significantly increased with a high multiplier, making the economy more unstable. Contrarily, with a low multiplier, changes in aggregate demand will not be amplified by a large amount, leading to a tendency for the economy to be more stable.
To learn more about tax multiplier
brainly.com/question/28140364
#SPJ4
