1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
olasank [31]
2 years ago
6

Which number is an irrational number?

Mathematics
2 answers:
babunello [35]2 years ago
3 0

Answer:

For this case we have by definition, that an irrational number is a number that can not be expressed as a fraction \ frac {a} {b}, where a and b are integers and b is different from zero.

A) , it is rational

B), it is rational

C) , it is rational

D)  it is not rational.

Step-by-step explanation:

dddddd its dddd

BESTI ILYSM

kotegsom [21]2 years ago
3 0

Answer:

A is the answer

Step-by-step explanation:

goodluck

You might be interested in
The Voyager 2 space probe took 2 years to make its closest approach to Jupiter. How many months did it take Voyager 2 to reach J
Tom [10]
It would be 24 months 
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
ILL BRAINLIEST YOU PLEASE HELP ME
VARVARA [1.3K]

Answer:

I am so sorry, I have never done that type of math before.

Step-by-step explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Solve each equation for x
Andrews [41]
BY taking the square root you can find each of them as follows:

1. sqrt(144) = 12

2. sqrt(25/289) = 5/17
6 0
3 years ago
In a recent year, 31.6% of all registered doctors were female. If there were 53,000 female registered doctors that year, what wa
Naily [24]

Answer:

The total number of registered doctors was 167,722.

Step-by-step explanation:

Total number of doctors:

The total number of doctors is given by x.

31.6% of all registered doctors were female. 53,000 female doctors.

This means that:

0.316x = 53000

What was the total number of registered doctors?

We have to solve the above equation for x. So

x = \frac{53000}{0.316}

x = 167722

The total number of registered doctors was 167,722.

6 0
3 years ago
Is this a function?<br><br> A) Yes<br> B) No
Vinil7 [7]

Answer:

no, this is not a function

Step-by-step explanation:

i hope this helps :)

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Apply the distributive property to factor out the greatest common factor. 21e+35 =21e+35
    11·1 answer
  • Divide 300 in a ratio of 3/7
    10·1 answer
  • 100/h , for h = -25 i need in a sentence
    5·1 answer
  • Consider the following cumulative relative frequency distribution.
    11·1 answer
  • There are 72 squares in the model. 72 squares What is the result of 72 divided by 12? 6 8 9 12
    9·2 answers
  • Which graph shows solution to which inequality
    11·1 answer
  • QUICK QUESTION! PLEASE HELP ME
    12·2 answers
  • AREA OF CIRCLE !! PLEASE HELP !! WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST !!
    5·1 answer
  • If a board 8ft is cut into three equal pieces how long are they
    5·1 answer
  • Evaluate (−3) ^−3
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!