All categories

2 years ago

So its about grams and kilograms

Mathematics

2 answers:

Kamila [148]2 years ago

8 0

Answer:

it is about grams and kilograms

Step-by-step explanation:

hope this helps

Readme [11.4K]2 years ago

3 0

Answer:

so its about grams and kilograms

Step-by-step explanation:

no question

but conversion,

1 kg = 1,000 g

You might be interested in

Polynomial add or subtract (-2x^2-4x+13)+(12x^2+2x-25)

BigorU [14]

1.Simplify.

-2{x}^{2}-4x+13+12{x}^{2}+2x-25−2x2−4x+13+12x2+2x−25

2.Collect like terms.

(-2{x}^{2}+12{x}^{2})+(-4x+2x)+(13-25)(−2x2+12x2)+(−4x+2x)+(13−25)

3.Simplify.

10{x}^{2}-2x-1210x2−2x−12

6 0

3 years ago

Michael pays $30 to enter a state fair, plus $4 for each ride. Which of the following equations represents his total cost? A. y=

omeli [17]

He spends 30 to enter and 4 per ride

y = 4x + 30....with x being the number of rides and y being the total cost

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Doug, a student in this class, knows how to write programs in JAVA. Everyone who knows how to write programs in JAVA can get a h

In-s [12.5K]

Missing Part of Question

Explain which rules of inference are used in the above

Answer:

Universal instantiation, Modus ponens and Existential generalization

Step-by-step explanation:

Splitting the Statement into two, we have

"Doug knows how to write program is Java"

and

"Doug can get a high paying job"

Represent Doug with x. Then the statements is rewritten as

P(x) = "x knows how to write program is Java"

and

Q(x) = "x can get a high paying job"

In logic, A premise is a statement in an argument that provides reason or support for the conclusion.

So, Statement 1 can be written as

1. P(x) ---- Premise

Then, we have

2. Vx(P(x) --> Q(x)) -- Premise. This mean that P(x) for all values in the domain.

The universal instantiation of (2) leads to

3. P(Doug) --> Q(Doug)

The modus ponens of the above gives

4. Q(Doug)

The existential generalisation from above gives

5. ƎxQ(x)

Which means someone in this class can get a high paying job.

PS:

Universal Instantiation is a valid rule of inference from a truth about each member of a class of individuals to the truth about a particular individual of that class; it is represented by VxP(x).

Existential Generalisation is a valid rule of inference that allows one to move from a specific statement, or one instance, to a quantified generalized statement, or existential proposition.

It is represented as ƎxP(x)

4 0

3 years ago

Choose the correct classification of 4x4 − 4x3 + 10x6

Vilka [71]

16 - 12 + 60 = 9

P ()

E 3*

M x

D (divide)

A +

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Riley is saving up to buy a new television. She needs a total of $1,049.77. Riley has saved $200.79 already and earns $77.18 per

Xelga [282]

11 weeks are required for Riley to work to save enough money to buy the new television

<h3><u>Solution:</u></h3>

Given that Riley needs a total of $1,049.77

Riley has saved $200.79 already and earns $77.18 per week at her job

To find: Number of weeks Riley need to work to save enough money to buy the new television

Remaining amount needed = $1,049.77 - $200.79

Remaining amount needed = $ 848.98

Let "n" be the number of weeks Riley need to work to save enough money to buy the new television

Also she earns $77.18 per week at her job

1 week ⇒ $ 77.18

"n" weeks ⇒ $ 848.98

Therefore, by cross multiplication,

$n \times 77.18 = 1 \times 848.98\\\\n = \frac{848.98}{77.18}\\\\n = 11$

Therefore 11 weeks are required for her to work to save enough money to buy the new television

<h3><u>Method 2:</u></h3>

<em>Total amount = amount already saved + ($77.18 per week at her job)("n" weeks)</em>

1,049.77 = 200.79 + (77.18)(n)

1049.77 - 200.79 = 77.18n

848.98 = 77.18n

$n = \frac{848.98}{77.18}$

n = 11

Therefore 11 weeks are required for her to work to save enough money to buy the new television

5 0

3 years ago