How did the REM system affect Otis Elevator's value chain?

Why does actual group productivity never equal potential productivity?

Rama09 [41]

The answer to the question is (C) time is lost to coordinating and organizing group members.

Actual group productivity is never quite equal to the expected productivity mainly because there are other processes involved in the team that the team members must do in order to reach the set common goal. Some of these processes usually include determining how to do the work and distributing the assignments to the right person, as well as setting the roles in the team.

4 0

2 years ago

Imperial Jewelers manufactures and sells a gold bracelet for $403.00. The company’s accounting system says that the unit product

AysviL [449]

Answer:

a) Financial advantage  $2,208 

b) The company should accept the special order, as it will increase its profit by $2,208

Explanation:

The relevant costs for decision to accept the special order are

I Incremental Revenue from the special order

2. incremental variable cost

3. The cost of the special tool

Unit variable cost = 143 + 90 + 8 + 7 = $240

Note that that the increase in material cost of $8 and the variable manufacturing overhead of $7 are relevant to the special order decision. Hence they are added.

And the balance of manufacturing overhead would be incurred either way. Therefore , they are not relevant for the decision

$

Sales revenue from special order

(22× $361.00) 7942

Variable cost of special order

(22× $240 ) (5280 )

Cost of special tool (454)

Financial advantage  2,208 

The company should accept the special order, as it will increase its profit by $2,208

3 0

2 years ago

______is the satisfaction or value people extract from consumed services or goods and those derived from pursued activities. A.

Mars2501 [29]

Answer:

utility

Explanation:

;/

7 0

3 years ago

There are four consumers willing to pay the following amounts for haircuts, and there are four haircutting businesses with the f

Softa [21]

Based on efficiency, the businesses that should cut hair are the A and C; moreover, to meet the demand, each firm will need to offer at least two haircuts.

The supply of a product or the units of a product that is offered to potential customers should always meet the number of real customers. In the same way, the price of the product should meet the price customers are willing to pay.

In this context, the best is that only firm A and C cut hair, this is because their prices per cut ($25 and $30) match the consumers' willingness to pay this includes Lorenzo ($35), Gilberto ($50), Juanita ($40) and Neha ($25).

Firm A can cut Neha's and Lorenzo's hair
Firm C can cut Gilberto's and Juanita's hair

Moreover, this implies each firm needs to do at least 2 haircuts to cover all the possible customers.

In the case of firms B and D, the price per cut is high ($40 - $45). Based on this, they should not cut hair as only a few customers can pay for this service, and this would be inefficient.

Learn more in: brainly.com/question/13225200

4 0

2 years ago

Kendra and Amelia operate an art gallery, owned as a partnership. Kendra disappeared. A few days later, Amelia learned that Kend

Jobisdone [24]

Answer:

Yes, Amelia responsible for the $75,000

Explanation:

It is given that Kendra and Amelia are jointly operating the art gallery, they are working together as a partnership. If a person does any work in the partnership business, other has full responsibility for partnership.

In the given question Kendra Has embezzled a $75,000 government grant, which will be responsible for partnership business but in the absence of Kendra, Amelia will also be responsible for all this.

6 0

3 years ago