<span>The Supreme Court is most likely to be accused of judicial activism in cases involving: protection of individual rights.
Writing for the conservative group, <em>The Heritage Foundation</em>, Elizabeth Slattery defines judicial activism as "w</span><span>hen judges fail to apply the Constitution or laws impartially according to their original public meaning, regardless of the outcome, or do not follow binding precedent of a higher court and instead decide the case based on personal preference."
Cases involving individual rights are likely to elicit charges of judicial activism because the Constitution does not spell out each and every sort of right citizens may have. New questions come up that were not considered or specified at the time the Constitution was written. For instance, <em>Roe v. Wade </em>(1973) addressed the question of abortion and an individual's right to privacy. <em>Obergefell v. Hodges </em>(2015) addressed the legality of same-sex marriage. Both are cases of individual rights, where the Constitution did not give direct instruction on the issues at stake. The decisions on those issues, to allow abortion and to allow same-sex marriage, both are criticized by conservatives as instances of judicial activism.</span>
Answer:
Polytheism
Explanation:
The Aztecs, like other Mesoamerican societies, had a wide pantheon of gods. As such they were a polytheistic society, which means they had many gods and each god represented different important parts of the world for Aztec people.
Answer:
D. Lincoin begins negotiating with Confederate leaders to end the Civil War peacefully.
Some women might object to the Equal Rights Amendments because, they are afraid the men will harm or be frustrated at them. In addition, some women liked the position they were at before the Equal Rights Amendment was introduced.
Churchill had a claim that could have prevented Germany from taking the Sudetenland, and this claim was:
- They could have joined forces with France so that they could be safer.
<h3>What is a claim?</h3>
A claim is an assertion that something is a case and typically with no evidence or proof to back it up.
In Churchill's claim, he offered NO evidence for it.
Read more about <em>Germany</em> here:
brainly.com/question/24909197
