Answer:
There is not enough evidence to support the claim that union membership increased.
Step-by-step explanation:
We are given the following in the question:
Sample size, n = 400
p = 12.5% = 0.125
Alpha, α = 0.05
Number of women belonging to union , x = 52
First, we design the null and the alternate hypothesis
The null hypothesis sates that 12.5% of U.S. workers belong to union and the alternate hypothesis states that there is a increase in union membership.
This is a one-tailed(right) test.
Formula:
Putting the values, we get,
Now, we calculate the p-value from the table.
P-value = 0.3812
Since the p-value is greater than the significance level, we fail to reject the null hypothesis and accept the null hypothesis.
Conclusion:
Thus, there is not enough evidence to support the claim that union membership increased.
Change the inches into feet. There are 12 inches in a foot so divide 144 by 12. That gives you 12, so then multiply 12 by 14. You are left with 168 feet.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
By proportion it will be (5/3) * 12
= 60/3
= 20 days.
Answer:
1210 acres
Step-by-step explanation:
Given data
let the old farmland be x acres
new farmland = 968 acres
therefore
let us find 20% of the old farmland
=20/100x
=0.2x
Hence
968+0.2x=x
collect like terms
968=x-0.2x
968=0.8x
x= 968/0.8
x=1210 acres
Answer:
what's the question, is it what's the ,ensure mentioned or something.