Answer:
Option (a) is correct.
Explanation:
Given that,
Completed units during June = 65,000 units
Ending inventory units = 7,000 units
Beginning inventory units = 4,000 units
Number of material equivalent units of production in the June 30:
= Completed units during June + Ending inventory units - Beginning inventory units
= 65,000 units + 7,000 units - 4,000 units
= 68,000 units
Therefore, the number of material equivalent units of production is 68,000 units.
Answer:
Quality is the perhaps the most desired thing in a good or service, however, sometimes, as customers, we have to compromise on quality for a cheaper price.
Personally, I look for quality when I buy a laptop. I have had four laptos in my life. Two of those laptops were HP, and the two other were Lenovo.
I had a good experience with my first HP laptop, so I bought another one years later. That second HP had many technical issues only a few months after the purchase, and a year later I ended up buyina new Lenovo laptop.
That first Lenovo lasted for over 4 years until I replaced it for a new one.
In this case, the lack of quality I have personally experienced with HP has made me ditch the brand altogether.
If increased government spending spurs a short-run expansion. The statement that complete the gap is:<u> Shifts to the left</u>, <u>Output endresources.</u>
<h3>What is aggregate supply?</h3>
Aggregate supply can be defined as the overall amount of goods and service that a firm intend to produce and supply at a point in time or at a particular period of time.
If an increase in government spending lead to short run expansion this means that there will be shift in aggregate supply of goods and service as aggregate supply will tend to shift to the left.
Therefore the statement that complete the gap is:<u> Shifts to the left</u>, <u>Output endresources.</u>
Learn more about aggregate supply here:brainly.com/question/19802257
#SPJ1
Answer:
"Try something and if it doesn't work, admit it and try something else."
Explanation:
When I took US Government, my teacher always emphasized that FDR was probably the best American President, and things like this really show why he admired him so much. Can you imagine those words coming out of the mouth of a modern politician?
Many people like to compare President Obama's first term with FDR's first term, but I believe that Obama had it easier. Not because the recession wasn't bad, but because it was fresh and new. President Bush's handling of the crisis was disastrous, but they messed up only for about one year. When FDR took office, the depression had been around for several years, so the negative effects were much greater.
When FDR took office the country was ravaged and nobody was sure that the new policies would work or not, or even what policies they should have implemented. That is why they engaged in a trial and error type of strategy where several options were explored to try to see what could work and what couldn't.
Answer: The correct answer is "4. when a third party is injured by an economic activity".
Explanation: A negative externality is when a third party is injured by an economic activity.
Negative externality refers to all kinds of harmful effects on society, generated by production or consumption activities, which are not present in its costs. Negative externalities occur when the action taken in our activities as a company, individual or family causes harmful side effects to third parties. Such effects are not incorporated in all costs. Since the highlighted negative effects are not present in the price of production or of the profit when consuming.
