Answer:
Explanation:
Liability of Petri:
On all the purchases, if payment is made within 30days from delivery, Petri gave the authority of a 5% discount to Adam. Upon extension of credit to customers, no terms were given to Adam.
In the case under consideration, Adam explicitly gave a false representation of his authority to get more sales on his account and thus, Petri is NOT accountable to John on his terms with Adam.
Liability of John:
Being a customer to Petri, John has to discover the detailed terms on discount and other payment terms with Petri when he called Petri. John is also accountable to make clarifications whether Adam has the authority to give a 10% discount and making payment in three installments.
In the case under consideration, John has failed to find the exact details on whether Adam has the authority to give a 10% discount. Thus, he is accountable to make the payment of $9500 in 30days.
Answer:
correct answer is Strategic allies
Explanation:
Strategic allies is a arrangement between 2 or more than 2 organization for undertaking mutual beneficial projects even both retain their independence.
as they have less complex than a joint venture
and for improving their product and development competitor in the market , they can enter into a strategic alliance
so as that both organizations can work on common coal with benefit
so correct answer is Strategic allies
They would opt to have a sale of bathing suits. They would offer discount from the original price of the bathing suit. In this way, the suits will be bought because its cheaper than before.
The store manager should make sure that the discounted price is still higher than the cost of the bathing suits so that they will still generate profit even at a lower value than initially expected.
Answer:
1.) The internal controls which were missing are from the separation of responsibilities. There must have been in place an inner regulator were an individual works with advisers while alternative individual or unit take-care of the expense procedure, then somebody else allow expenses and then office should distribute the expenditures. There is an absence of inner controls as you can realize that the corporation amalgamated with a larger corporation and no one measured other accounts such as Jackson and company any longer.
2.) With the lack of control, this offered Helen the chance to effect the fraud. With this presence said, she was talented to emulate sign receipts and spend the retailer’s expenditures. She were also the one in responsibility of office the initial and final of accounts. In short, she had several accountabilities that should have remained separated up better and had diverse individuals for the separations of the job. In addition, she needed a bank description from the corporation where she was capable to put the expenditures and pay individual expenditures.
3.) The method this fraud might be noticed is the inspection squad can ask the bank for reports. They might also conference sellers. The accounting section should have ended sure they were doing the due diligence in dealers and corresponding the receipts with statements and expenditures.
