A photocopier cost $105,000 when new and has accumulated depreciation of $96,000. if the business discards this plant asset, the result is a loss of 9,000.
During the asset's anticipated useful life, depreciation is allocated in order to charge a fair percentage of the depreciable amount in each accounting period. Amortization of assets with predetermined useful lives is included in depreciation. Depreciation enables businesses to recoup the cost of an item at the time of acquisition. Instead of collecting the full cost of an asset right away, the technique enables businesses to do so during the asset's lifecycle. This enables businesses to replace current assets with the necessary quantity of revenue in the future.
Subtract the asset's cost from its salvage value (what you anticipate it to be worth at the end of its useful life) to determine depreciation using the straight-line technique. The outcome is the amount or depreciable basis.
Depreciation = asset's cost - salvage value
Depreciation = $105,000 - $96,000
Depreciation = $9,000
To know more about Depreciation refer to: brainly.com/question/15085226
#SPJ4
Answer:
e. None of the above assumptions would invalidate the model
Explanation:
Incomplete question <em>"The constant growth model is given below: P0 = [D0(1 + g)]/[(rs - g)]"</em>
<em />
According to dividend discount model,
P0 = D1/(R-G)
D1 - Dividend at t =1
R - Required rate
G - Growth rate
This would be invalid if R < G. In other words, Dividend growth model will be invalid in only one situation, that is, when growth rate is more than require return. In this situation growth model cannot be used.
Answer:
due to elimination
income will decrease by $526000
Explanation:
Given data
Sales = $1180000
Variable expenses = $654000
Fixed expenses = $620000
to find out
incremental effect on net income
solution
we know here total sale is $1180000 and Variable expenses is $654000
so contribution if the division is dropped is sales - Variable expenses
put these value
contribution = 1180000 - 654000
contribution = 526000
so we say that due to elimination
income will decrease by $526000
<u>The reason that Pablo Picasso, become wealthy during his lifetime and the artist, Vincent van Gogh, remain poor his entire life:</u>
Pablo Picasso and Vincent van Gogh had more features in common. They had unanimously indistinct style of arts which had become immediately identifiable.
In spite of all that, Picasso died as a rich man owning an estate which is estimated at nearly 750 million dollar whereas Van Gogh died as a pauper.
Studies claim that the reason behind this would be that, Van Gogh remained to be a loner and socially inactive. He was depending on his brother to meet the social world and in contrast Picasso was a charismatic active member in various social clubs where her had multiple number of contacts and connections.
It's been said that Pablo Picasso was a hub who had a vast network of social lines and Vincent Van Gogh was a silent or solitary node.
But now, the paintings of both the greatest artists were well spoken and sell for more than 100,000,000 US Dollars.
