Answer:
Umm
Step-by-step explanation:
3 rulers = 1 meter
Answer:
A
Step-by-step explanation:
You would first add c to the side that k is on and then divide k+c by 4 because it is 4x which means they are being multiplied together so you have to divide to get them apart.
Hexagon has six edges. The figure you're trying to figure out is hexagon I guess.
<u>The given expressions 7+ 7x ; 7 x + 1/7 are not equivalent or equal </u>
<u>to each other </u>
<u />
<u>Step-by-step explanation:</u>
Let us firstly assume that 7 + 7x is equivalent ( to 7(x + 1/7) so that means
7 + 7x = 7(x + 1/7)
7 + 7x = 7x + 7(1/7)
7 + 7x = 7x + 1
7x + 7 = 7x + 1
Now, subtracting 7x from both sides, we get:
7x - 7x + 7 = 7x - 7x + 1
(7 - 7)x + 7 = (7 - 7)x + 1
(0)x + 7 = (0)x + 1 thus their occurs a false statement:
7 = 1 ( we know, 7 >1)
Thus we can say that
<u>7 + 7x is NOT equivalent to 7(x + 1/7)</u>
Answer:
There is evidence to show that the single-earner couples on average spend more time watching television together
Step-by-step explanation:
Given that a recent study compared the time spent together by single- and dual-earner couples. According to the records kept by the wives during the study, the mean amount of time spent together watching television among the single-earner couples was 61 minutes per day, with a standard deviation of 15.5 minutes. For the dual-earner couples, the mean number of minutes spent watching television was 48.4 minutes, with a standard deviation of 18.1 minutes.

(Right tailed test where x stands for single earner and y for double)
Let us assume sample sizes are 500 each.
Difference -12.600
Standard error 1.066
95% CI -14.6913 to -10.5087
t-statistic -11.823
DF 998
Significance level P < 0.0001
Since p is less than alpha we reject null hypothesis.
There is evidence to show that the single-earner couples on average spend more time watching television together