1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
mixas84 [53]
3 years ago
15

Which theory about the origins of government holds that government was first imposed by force?

History
2 answers:
xeze [42]3 years ago
4 0
It would be the Force Theory which is the name of a government's origin in which it began due to imposing a force. In addition, the said theory mainly describes that a person or a group of people taking over a specific territory forces the population residing there to abide by their rules and beliefs.
zalisa [80]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Force theory

Explanation:

The theory about the origins of government that holds that government was first imposed by force is known as force theory. Force theory states that government began when a person, or group of people took control of a particular area and forced everyone to follow their rules and beliefs. This is one of the possible ways in which government was formed.

You might be interested in
What order in history were middle ages, ancient rome, ancient greece and renessiance?
Mrac [35]
Ancient Greece, Ancient Rome, Middle Ages, Renessiance
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What measures did the Soviet Union take to reduce its food shortages?
german
Created Ukrainian collectives
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Where did the Russian word "tsar” come from?
Hitman42 [59]

Answer:

The Russian word "tsar" is derived from the Latin title for the Roman emperors, caesar.

6 0
1 year ago
Read 2 more answers
While francis scott key, the author of this song, watched anxiously through the night of september 13–14, the bombardment from f
aalyn [17]

B. Baltimore,Maryland

7 0
3 years ago
How were Simon bolivar and Jose de San Martin similar
Butoxors [25]

José de San Martín vs. Simón Bolívar

José de San Martín, 1778-1850, and Simon Bolívar, 1783-1830, were two of the primary causes of independence of countries from colonial powers in Latin America. Simon Bolívar is primarily known for liberating Venezuela, and he is called the Liberator of the North. José de San Martín, known as the Liberator of the South, is primarily known for freeing Argentina. Both men are well-known and lived during about the same time period and even met each other. However, their areas of liberation, methods of liberation and motives were very different from each other.

Bolívar and Martín differed in areas of jurisdiction – Venezuela and Argentina, respectively, as well as methods and means of revolution. Bolívar was 26 years old when Venezuela declared its independence in 1811, and under the revolutionary leader he brought back Francisco de Miranda, who had long advocated freedom from the Spanish rule Venezuela was once under, to become Venezuela’s leader. However, after an erratic and unsuccessful leadership, Bolívar captured Miranda (after his rebel army was stopped) and betrayed him by turning over to the Spanish, but the Spanish only sent Bolívar into exile (unlike Miranda, who they imprisoned). After returning from exile, Bolívar taught creoles that they could rebel successfully against 3 decades of Spanish rule, but was then drove out by the Spaniards. After being chased out of Venezuela three more times, while using terror tactics the Spanish had once used against Creoles such as suffocation, while gaining the support of the British and a bond with Haiti, and while declaring that he would abolish slavery as his first official act (if in power), he decided to build a guerilla warfare army in 1817. After defeating the Spanish in New Granada (which consisted of present-day Columbia, Ecuador, Venezuela, and Panama) using guerilla tactics and the help of thousands of mercenaries from Britain and Germany, he met with San Martín and desired to take advantage of Spain’s falling empire (due to political disagreements and an army revolt), but did not collaborate with him on a major scale. Bolívar formed a series of nations called “Grand Columbia” out of New Granada from which he intended to make a “model of strength and aggression from outside and of cooperation inside”, however, this unification soon disbanded itself (Adams, 33). Bolívar’s last battle ended in splendor in 1823, as it was entirely between cavalry with swords and lances.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • In what way did Christopher Columbus fail to meet his objective concerning his voyage in 1492?
    10·1 answer
  • The Ten Commandments are a list of rules for
    7·2 answers
  • Which group was not targeted as enemies of the ku klux klan
    11·1 answer
  • What is extractive economy in your own words?
    15·1 answer
  • Who was the 13th president of the u.s?
    13·1 answer
  • Jones hopes that more of King's dream comes true
    5·1 answer
  • How had the role of women at home and in the workplace change between 1890 and 1920?
    6·1 answer
  • The region of the country that experienced the greatest population growth during the Great Depression was
    6·1 answer
  • -Describe the causes for the fall of the Soviet Union The Hungarian Uprising:
    5·1 answer
  • Why was Themistocles ostracized?
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!