1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
mixas84 [53]
3 years ago
15

Which theory about the origins of government holds that government was first imposed by force?

History
2 answers:
xeze [42]3 years ago
4 0
It would be the Force Theory which is the name of a government's origin in which it began due to imposing a force. In addition, the said theory mainly describes that a person or a group of people taking over a specific territory forces the population residing there to abide by their rules and beliefs.
zalisa [80]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Force theory

Explanation:

The theory about the origins of government that holds that government was first imposed by force is known as force theory. Force theory states that government began when a person, or group of people took control of a particular area and forced everyone to follow their rules and beliefs. This is one of the possible ways in which government was formed.

You might be interested in
Ap world history unit test,!!
lorasvet [3.4K]

Answer:

C.) While both the Ottoman Empire and Western European states relied heavily on forced conversions to expand and maintain their empires, the Ottoman Empire remained more religiously tolerant than the Western European empires.

Explanation:

I got this question right on the first try. Here's why I knew it was C. You would need to have some knowledge about the Ottoman Empire's role of religion. I don't know if it says in the passage, so if you do find it, then give me a heads up. Remember, how did the Ottoman Empire treat the minorities? Did they force persecution/conversion to Islam? Well, not really. Although they did develop the devshirme system, it was kinda of a force conversion because the children had to give up their Christian belief, but it was seen as an opportunity. They weren't punished, so answer A is not right. So they did practice religious tolerance. Also the Ottoman Empire tried to expand the empire to make it bigger as well. There wasn't any religious wars carried out the Ottoman Empire, and answer B does not make sense. Where in the passage does it say about those two empires having efforts of doing mass conversions. Look at Source 2. Sorry if this explanation is long, but I hope this helps :)

6 0
3 years ago
One of the results of the contact between the Europeans and the Native Americans was the spread of disease. Which of the followi
nirvana33 [79]

Native American populations were decimated by diseases that had been brought by the Europeans.

Explanation:

When the Europeans discovered and settled in the New World, lot of changes occurred on both sides of the Atlantic. Many things were positive, especially when it came to exchange of goods, plants, and animals. Unfortunately, there were some negatives in it, with the spreading of diseases being among the most influential. The exchange between the two sides is known as the Columbian exchange.

The Europeans and the Native Americans had some diseases that were unique about them, and their immune systems were adapted to them, but they didn't had response for the diseases of the opposite side. Both sides suffered from this, but the effect was much greater among the Native Americans, as the majority of their populations died out because of the spreading of European diseases among them, such as the common cold and the smallpox.

Other negatives that occurred were:

  • numerous wars
  • systematic assimilation and genocide
  • overtaking of territory

Learn more about the Columbian exchange brainly.com/question/2599432

#learnwithBrainly

3 0
4 years ago
Helpppppppppppppppp
Nikitich [7]
All of the above...they all seem right to me and I take Ap world history
3 0
3 years ago
What factors gave the invading Japanese military an advantage during their attack on the Philippines?
gayaneshka [121]

Answer: they had to get a nother army

Explanation:  cause they did

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
(04.02 mc) how did people in the north react to the fugitive slave law? most accepted it as an unavoidable evil to achieve the c
rjkz [21]

In reaction to the fugitive slave law, most of the people in the north showed open defiance to the law and devised means to support the Underground Railroad to Canada. It is reported that they formed committees to facilitate the transport of African American slaves to Canada through the Underground Railroad.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of these would best describe an immediate effect of the invention and mass production of the light bulb
    5·2 answers
  • What effect did malcolm x have on civil rights?
    9·1 answer
  • Why did christians travel to Jerusalem:
    10·2 answers
  • The role of the U.S. in the Korean Conflict _____. was unwarranted spurred the establishment of the Communist regime only lasted
    9·1 answer
  • What is it that gets people to get triggered
    8·2 answers
  • 2. There were similarities and differences between the American and French revolutions. Write a paragraph that compares and cont
    5·1 answer
  • How much money does national organization of women spend or raise
    12·2 answers
  • What is the difference between a citizen and a representative?
    6·1 answer
  • Help plssssssssssssssssssssssssssss
    5·1 answer
  • How is the Declaration of Independence relevant in today’s government?
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!