The scale factor that Ivory used to create their scaled copy is;
<u><em>Scale is 1 interval on graph represents 4 units of the rectangle. This is 1:4 ratio.</em></u>
- From the given image, we can see that the y-axis of the rectangle has 3 intervals while the x-axis has 1 intervals
- Now, from the image, we are told that the area of the scaled copy is 48 square units.
What this means is that the area of the triangle she is trying to represent with that graph is 48 square units.
- Now, if one interval of the graph is x-units, then it means;
length; y-axis = 3x units
width; x-axis = x units
- Area of a rectangle is given by;
Area = Length × width
Thus;
3x * x = 48
3x² = 48
x² = 48/3
x² = 16
x = √16
x = 4
<em>Thus, 1 interval on the graph represents 4 units of the rectangle.</em>
Read more at; brainly.com/question/17182684
Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:
Given:
Center of circle is at (5, -4).
A point on the circle is 
Equation of a circle with center
and radius 'r' is given as:

Here, 
Radius of a circle is equal to the distance of point on the circle from the center of the circle and is given using the distance formula for square of the distance as:
Using distance formula for the points (5, -4) and (-3, 2), we get

Therefore, the equation of the circle is:

Now, rewriting it in the form asked in the question, we get

Cross multiply to get 8k+24=56 then solve for k so subtract 24 from each side to get 8k=32 so k=4
Answer: B,C,D,E,G
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
C) fails to consider that commuting trips may cause significantly more than 20 percent of the traffic congestion
Step-by-step explanation:
The correct option is - C) fails to consider that commuting trips may cause significantly more than 20 percent of the traffic congestion
Reason -
Option A is incorrect because the statistics can not be incorrect.
Option B is incorrect because they are not talking about the city.
Option C is correct because Urban rail reduces congestion.
Option D is incorrect because the opposers cited the example of one city and the supporters are presenting evidence in the case of that city itself.
Option E is incorrect because they are providing an explanation for why the commuters data given by opposers is not relevant. The opposers talked about commuters.