<span>This is of course somewhat of a subjective question, but in general most would agree that in general expansion was not justifiable since the Mexicans and Natives were doing nothing to provoke the US. One could argue it was justifiable since Americans needed more land. </span>
Answer:
what ellaborate more and maybe i could help you!
Answer: B. the two opposing generals were Erwin Rommel of Germany’s 6th Army and Nikita Khrushchev of the Red Army
Explanation:
The Battle of Stalingrad was one of the most brutal and bloody battles of World War II and it is estimated that the Russians lost more men here than the United States did in the entire war.
Even though Nikita Khrushchev was present in the battle, he was not the head of the army but was present as a commissar. As for Erwin Rommel, he was not in command of German forces in the East and his area of influence was Africa and then the Western front.
HOLY GOD....i thought i was the only one!!!you noticed it too....i have no idea...i just kinda went with it
Answer:
France, England and Spain
Explanation:
In the early 1300s France, England and Spain were the strongest monarchical states by 1300s. The reason these states were able to be stronger was that they often intermarry between the royal families. Thereby solidifying the power.
They also practiced absolute monarchy. During his time the King holds all the authority such that no law can curb them. They also have personnel that can travel long distances through the sea
