Answer:
<em>Yes, this is antitrust violation. Because, the tend to restrain trade in that small city thereby denying other small player brokerage firms from making a living due to their monopolistic actions among themselves.</em>
Explanation:
Antitrust laws are designed in-order to prohibit a number of business practices that restrain trade. Examples of illegal practices are price-fixing conspiracies, corporate mergers that are likely to cut back the competitive fervor of certain markets, and predatory acts designed to gain or hold on to monopoly power.
<em>Violations of such laws attract sanctions and punishment from the regulatory body in-charge of protecting such.</em>
Answer:C. It makes it more difficult for the company to define an appropriate time period.
Explanation: Obsolete Items or products are products are no longer useful or relevant,it can be used to describe a product whose Quality has adversely depleted making it not useful.
With the information,since the products are fast becoming Obsolete than when compared to 10years ago,it makes it more difficult to determine or arrive at the appropriate time period for the company to keep the product before it becomes obsolete.
An
example of a case where a cost and revenue function do not have a break
even point includes, when the profit margin is larger than the losses
of the business.
Based on movies and books I've read, I noticed that the culture in South America is big on familial love. Their family spreads not only immediately, but even to cousins after cousins. You can see them living in family compounds and they greet each other as families.
Therefore, this could be a reason for the company's choice of a mechanistic structure. This structure is about the working together of single parts to create an efficient mechanism. Thus. familial relationship is very important. They have to invest in close family ties through social events.
Answer:
C. VL = VU + PV(Tax Shield) - PV(CFD)
Explanation:
The static trade off theory is a theory of capital structure in corporate finance, first proposed by Alan Kraus and Robert H. Litzenberger. The theory emphasizes the trade-offs between the tax benefits of increasing leverage and the cost of bankruptcy associated with higher leverage. The <u>answer is C</u> as we know relative to the unleveraged firm, leverage provides both costs and benefits. The benefits are the tax shields provided by debt.
