Answer:
1. The driver must signal that he is going to stop the car and then he must stop the car away from the children and wait for all of them to cross the street safely so that he can drive again.
2. Decrease speed, allow the emergency car to pass, signal whenever necessary.
3. It is necessary that you slow down, keep your car away from the truck and do not try to overtake it, unless it is allowed and the truck driver signals.
4. Stopping the car before the tracks and watching if the train is close.
5. The driver must act calmly and politely and provide all the information requested by the police.
Explanation:
Driving is a task that requires great responsibility and attention. It is necessary to adopt certain behaviors on the track that provide protection for all drivers and pedestrians. In addition, it is necessary to adopt behaviors that match the type of vehicle and the type of situation that the track is in, preventing accidents and problems from occurring.
Have instructions , information .
According to Kohlberg, a level of moral development during which moral judgments are based on fear of punishment or desire for pleasure.
<h3>
What is Kohlberg's conventional moral reasoning?</h3>
According to Kohlberg's Structural Theory of Moral Development, which takes a cognitive-developmental approach to moral development and identifies six invariant, sequential, universal, and progressively complex structural stages of moral judgement throughout life, conventional moral reasoning is the second of three levels of moral reasoning.
According to Kohlberg's theory of moral development, as a person's cognitive capacity increases, so does their understanding of who is deserving of justice.
In the third step of Kohlberg's model of moral reasoning, known as postconventional reasoning, a person makes decisions based on their own convictions, even if those beliefs conflict with legal requirements or social norms. The six stages that make up Kohlberg's theory's framework are arranged sequentially in increasing complexity tiers. He divided his six levels into three broad categories.
Hence, According to Kohlberg, a level of moral development during which moral judgments are based on fear of punishment or desire for pleasure.
To learn more about Kohlberg's conventional moral reasoning refer to:
brainly.com/question/24727483
#SPJ4
I think the summary judgement would be inappropriate in this case
Summary judgement is entered by the court if the plaintiff does not have sufficient evidence that the defendants actually do what they're accused of before moving to trial.
On this case, There is a strong proof that peoples restaurant is aware of Hoag's alcoholism : <u>intoxicated</u>
This mean that sabo can proof that the bar know hoag is an alcoholic and had served enough amount to hoag to get him intoxicated.
This mean that Sabo's case is strong enough to be brought to the trial. keep in mind that Sabo is unlikely to win the trial since the restaurant does not directly involved in the accident. but we can definitely say that summary judgement would be inappropriate in this case.
Answer:
Meta-communication
Explanation:
According to my research on different types of communications, I can say that based on the information provided within the question the term being defined is called Meta-communication. Like mentioned in the question, this is a communication discussing communication. It dictates how verbal commands or information should be interpreted by individuals as well as the stimuli that is added to the verbal information that has been provided.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
