Answer:
20 years mortgage:
maximum loan $ 209, 371.16
interest paid $ 150,628.84
30 years mortage
maximum loan $ 250,187.4216
interest paid $ 289,812.58
Explanation:
20 years mortgage:
C 1,500.00
time 240 (20 years x 12 months)
rate 0.005 ( 6% annual / 12 months per year)
PV $209,371.1575
Quota x number of cuotas - principal = total interest
1,500 x 240 - 209,371.16 = 150628.84
30 years mortgage
C 1,500.00
time 360
rate 0.005
PV $250,187.4216
Quota x number of cuotas - principal = total interest
1,500 x 360 - 250,187.42 = 289,812.58
Answer:
Sales revenue $ 710,000
Cost of goods sold $ 385,000
Gross Profit $ 325,000
Selling expense 71,000
Administrative expense 91,000
Operating Income 163,000
Non-Operating Income
Interest revenue 44,000
Gain on sale of investments 91,000
Interest expense (28,000)
Restructuring costs (67,000)
Income before taxes 203,000
Income tax expense (50,750)
Net Income 152,250
Shares outstanding 100,000
Earnings per share $1.52
Explanation:
We need to determinate gross profit.
then, the operating income therefore the interest and restructuring cost are not considered. Same goes for the gain on investment as aren't part of the business normal activities.
Answer:
($1,100,000)
Explanation:
Given that
Loans made to affiliated corporations = $1,400,000
Proceeds from sale of Equipment = $300,000
The computation of net cash provided (used) by investing activities is here below:-
Net cash provided(used) by investing activities = (Loans made to affiliated corporations) - Proceeds from sale of Equipment
= ($1,400,000) - $300,000
= ($1,100,000)
So, for computing the cash provided(used) by investing activities we simply applied the above formula.
The proposed response of Adam Smith based on each scenario is given below:
<h3>Scenario 1</h3>
He would say that the pricing system should remain the main determinant of the market and the interference of the government was uncalled for.
<h3>Scenario 2</h3>
He would side with the free market system and be an opponent of the law that frowns on importation.
<h3>Scenario 3</h3>
He would support the suspension of the antitrust laws.
<h3>Scenario 4</h3>
He would believe that markets should not be regulated and the free market system should continue.
<h3>Who is Adam Smith?</h3>
He is the father of modern economics for his work in pioneering ideas such as free trade and the gross domestic product
Hence, we can see that the proposed response of Adam Smith based on each scenario is given above.
Read more about Adam Smith here:
brainly.com/question/50
#SPJ1
Answer: Rs. 120,000
Explanation:
At the end of the year, both assets and liabilities had doubled. New asset and liability figures are therefore:
Assets = Rs. 200,000
Liabilities = Rs. 100,000
Net income is part of equity and as there is no equity, net income must be the entire equity.
Assets = Equity + Liabilities
200,000 = Equity + 100,000
Equity = 200,000 - 100,000
= Rs. 100,000
From this Net income, dividends were distributed to the tune of Rs. 20,000. This should be added back to see the full figure.
= 100,000 + 20,000
= Rs. 120,000
