Answer: The most expensive car he can afford to buy is a 4-door hatchback.
Explanation:
He has $24,000 to spend.
But sales tax is 6%.
6% of $24,000 = $1,440.
He is left with a balance of $22,560.
This means in actuality, he has $22,560 for a car.
From the table, the 4-door hatchback cost $22,500 which just slightly below the $22,560 he has to spend removing sales tax. This is the most expensive car he can afford to buy as all other cars are way above $22,560.
The correct answer among the choices given is option B. The purpose of an expectorant is to liquefy mucous. An expectorant is a drug that aids in the clearance of mucus in the respiratory system. It thins out mucus so it can be expelled from the body easier.
Answer:
The pro of the 11th amendment are that states cannot be sued by a citizen who does not live in that state in federal court. The con is that states gain some immunity and you cannot petition them for lost property or funds.
Explanation:
The Pros of the 11th amendment:
The 11th Amendment to the US Constitution is a complicated but short amendment that has various implications. Basically it says that the federal courts of the United States cannot hear cases where a citizen who lives in another state or the citizen of another country is petitioning to sue that state. This gives individual states their sovereignty so they can act without bringing upon themselves a lawsuit. It is also good in terms of our state taxes and the costs to administrate the state. It seems that before the 11th Amendment of the US Constitution was ratified, most of the cases that were brought against a state in this way were suing the state for money they had failed to pay back or the return of property. This is the case with a British citizen named William Vassall who apparently sued the state of Massachusetts for the land they confiscated from him during the Revolutionary War. This would become an expensive process for each state if it were still possible.
The Cons of the 11th amendment:
The 11th Amendment has negative implications too in the sense that you can be wronged by a state and you will never be able to redress it by appealing to federal courts. It gives states a level of immunity if they are confiscating property from people who live out of state or who come from another country. It seems to put the rights of the state above the rights of a citizen or foreign citizen in this regard.
