Answer:
The answer is: She used the justice approach, realizing that the greater good is served because people learn to help each other in their own interest.
Explanation:
Justice approach: an ethical decision is a decision that distributes benefits and costs (or punishments) among those involved in a fair, equitable, and impartial way.
Paula used this approach because she believed the agents had acted improperly and that they were harming the US Secret Service.
I consider any organization a team, so in order for it to work well its members must be respected both by their peers and by the other teams´ members. If you consider the various types of activities this specific agency carries out, other not so friendly "teams" (other secret services or even terrorists) could use this type of information to damage or compromise those activities. So the well being of all the country was being jeopardized by a group of bad agents.
Answer:
<em>Run a recoverability test and then a fair value test.</em>
Explanation:
Business assets with a loss of value are subject to impairment tests to assess and identify the magnitude of the loss.
<em>Measuring the magnitude of the loss requires two steps:</em>
- Performing a recoverability check is to decide whether an impairment loss occurred by determining whether the future value of the undiscounted cash flows of the asset is less than the asset's book value. If the cash flow is less than the value of the book, the loss will be assessed.
- Measure the cost of damage by measuring the difference between the book value and the asset's market value.
Answer:
option (C) - 6.11%
Explanation:
Data provided :
Coupon rate one year ago = 6.5% = 0.065
Semiannual coupon rate =
= 0.0325
Face value = $1,000
Present market yield = 7.2% = 0.072
Semiannual Present market yield, r =
= 0.036
Now,
With semiannual coupon rate bond price one year ago, C
= 0.0325 × $1,000
= $32.5
Total period in 15 years = 15 year - 1 year = 14 year
or
n = 14 × 2 = 28 semiannual periods
Therefore,
The present value = ![C\times[\frac{(1-(1+r)^{-n})}{r}]+FV(1+r)^{-n}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=C%5Ctimes%5B%5Cfrac%7B%281-%281%2Br%29%5E%7B-n%7D%29%7D%7Br%7D%5D%2BFV%281%2Br%29%5E%7B-n%7D)
= ![\$32.5\times[\frac{(1-(1+0.036)^{-28})}{0.036}]+\$1,000\times(1+0.036)^{-28}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5C%2432.5%5Ctimes%5B%5Cfrac%7B%281-%281%2B0.036%29%5E%7B-28%7D%29%7D%7B0.036%7D%5D%2B%5C%241%2C000%5Ctimes%281%2B0.036%29%5E%7B-28%7D)
or
= $32.5 × 17.4591 + $1,000 × 0.37147
= $567.42 + $371.47
= $938.89
Hence,
The percent change in bond price = data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/025fa/025fa4ff74ccfaaf92662257aa7f1f6105f28635" alt="\frac{\textup{Final price - Initial price}}{\textup{Initial price}}\times100\%"
= data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d16fa/d16fa37c9ac61af19d80cc67c738b72e8a3e7230" alt="\frac{\textup{938.89-1,000}}{\textup{1,000}}"
= - 6.11%
therefore,
the correct answer is option (C) - 6.11%
Answer:
The answer is below.
Explanation:
The z score is a used in statistics to determine by how many standard deviations the raw score is above or below the mean. The z score is given by:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/12706/127061d79da1576bd4eddb36fd2bf366e80f3d31" alt="z=\frac{x-\mu}{\sigma}\\\\where\ x=raw\ score, \mu=mean,\sigma=standard\ deviation\\\\For\ a\ sample\ size(n):\\\\z=\frac{x-\mu}{\sigma/\sqrt{n} }"
a) Given that n = 100, μ = 2000, σ = 18
For x < 1995 millimeters:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a2050/a2050c4aae7cd647283d8fafaf23f21efd8d0d21" alt="z=\frac{x-\mu}{\sigma/\sqrt{n} }=\frac{1995-2000}{18/\sqrt{100} } =-2.78"
From the normal distribution table, P(x < 1995) = P(z < -2.78) = 0.0027
b) P(z > z*) = 10% = 0.1
P(z < z*) = 1 - 0.1 = 0.9
z* = 1.28
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/76a68/76a68775cb61ab5e1fa13a0566ae51fe0259b620" alt="z*=\frac{x-\mu}{\sigma/\sqrt{n} }\\\\1.28=\frac{x-2000}{18/\sqrt{100} }\\\\x-2000 =-2.304\\\\x=2002.3\ ml\\\\"
From the normal distribution table, P(z < z
Answer:<u><em>(d.) Evaluation of whether the response made to a demand or threat was effective</em></u>
Explanation:
Richard Lazarus stated that stress is a process where the manufacturing of stressors by the surrounding, and the effect on an individual subjected to these stressors.
He also stated that these cognitive appraisal will happen when a individual considers two major element that add in his response to stress. These two element are as follow :
The baleful propensity of the stress to the individual, and
The classification of resources required to decrease, endure or decimate the stressor and the stress it produces.