Answer:
- <u>Disease Prevention</u> - One of the top goals of genetic engineering is the improvement of health.Those working in the genetics field hope that manipulating the genes of humans will one day enable science to prevent people from contracting these potentially deadly diseases. Some diseases are more likely in certain people because they have a history of the disease in the family, meaning it could be passed down and make someone predisposed to a particular illness.
- <u>Then there is,</u> Pharmaceutical Development- Genetic engineering can be used to improve the drugs available on the marketplace by making them more effective and safer. By using genetic modification scientists can make pharmaceuticals more effective than the existing versions of the medicine.
- <u>Finally, Agriculture</u> - Saving the seeds from the best looking plants to replant the following year has been a method of manual genetic selection for many years. But science has made it possible to engineer plants to produce the biggest and best fruits and vegetables possible by replacing the genes and designing plants with the most desirable traits.
* Hopefully this helps:) Mark me the brainliest:)!!!
~234483279c20~
Answer:
In my opinion....
Yes, somtetimes it's persoanl depending on the situation/risk in which you have to choose a side from. Example/Explanation is on bottom ↓
Explanation:
Personal risk - <u>It is anything that exposes you to the risk of losing something of value.</u>
Usually, personal risk is associated with your financial investments and insurance. These investments may be in the stock market, mutual funds, or loans to others.
Risk - <u>It is the potential that a decision will lead to a loss or an undesirable outcome.</u>
In fact, almost any human decision carries some risk, but some decisions are much riskier/more risky than others.
Pls, choose me as brainliest!
The speaker describes frustration with racial inequality
Answer:
the correct answer is freedom
Answer:
<h3>Plessy v. Ferguson case.</h3>
Explanation:
- The Plessy v. Ferguson case of 1896 ruled out that segregation was constitutional as long as both blacks and whites enjoyed opportunities that were separate but equal.
- However, the Supreme Court's verdict in the Plessy v. Ferguson case of 1896 was challenged by Justice Earl Warren stating that the idea of ‘separate but equal’ in public school was unconstitutional and inherently unequal.
- Thus, Chief Justice Earl Warren issued the Supreme Court’s unanimous decision in Brown v. Board of Education, ruling that racial segregation in public schools violated the "Equal Protection Clause” of the 14th Amendment.