<span>This question is referring to dual process theory which focuses on the formation of thought through one of two ways. Implicit or automatic thinking is unconscious, unintentional and often habitual. Explicit or or controlled thinking is both conscious and intentional. Therefore, implicit should likely fill the first blank and explicit the second.</span>
Answer:
All three cases went to the Supreme Court for ruling.
Explanation:
The cases that went to the supreme corut ruling will be more likely to be considered as a landmark decision, which is the type of decisions that influence the live of the people on national scale.
I'll describe the effect of each decisions on national scale:
-Plessy v. Ferguson,
This decision resulted in the application of segregation law. Black people all across the nation were required to use different public facilities than the white citizens because of this.
- Brown v. Board of Education,
This decision diminish the effect of plessy v. Ferguson since it make the segregation of schools become illegal.
- Regents of California v. Bakke
This affect the people nationally because it allow race to become a factor for college admission . (It become the basis of affirmative action that help minorities get into universities)
Sheep
carcasses were injected with a poison by the sheep ranchers, in this way
coyotes would sicken but will not kill them. It is sheep ranchers’ way to
protect their sheep from coyotes in an application of classical conditioning
principles reported in the text.
He thought he should extend his borders because he wanted us to have benefits of our democratic government,that should be extended over distant regions which was selected for homes
