Answer:
The basis of the consanguineal relationship is blood.
Explanation:
Cognates or consanguineal kins are related due to the blood ties. This consanguineal relationship is based in the basic idea that they have the same blood.
Kinship is one of the most important aspects for a society, since it is the basis for its social interaction and organization from the the first institution that is composed by the family members and their descendants.
Answer:
Germany’s offer of land posed a direct threat to the United States.
hope this helps :)
<span>Carla is accusing Henry of deception due to <u>“Omission”.</u></span>
Deception by omission<span> is also called as passive deception. This occurs when
information is withheld from another person. In this case, Henry was keeping
from Carla his horrific past therefore leading to deception by omission.</span>
There is no objective answer to this question, as both sides have arguments that support their views.
If you believe that you are bound by Hobbes' argument, it is because of tacit consent. Tacit consent means that, even though you have not explicitly agreed to follow laws, you have indicated your agreement through other means, for example, by using the public services of the government or by remaining within the limits of your country. Also, you could argue that any rational person would prefer to follow the rules of the government than to live in the state of nature. Therefore, if you are rational, your consent is assumed. Finally, you could also argue that while you did not explicitly agreed, maybe your ancestors did, which still binds you as a member of the same society.
On the other hand, if you believe that you are not bound by Hobbes' argument, you could argue that any contract that is not freely agreed upon is not valid. As the government uses force to make you act according to the law, you cannot be considered to be freely consenting. Also, you can argue that agreeing to follow some rules does not imply following <em>all</em> of the laws of the country. Finally, a common argument against Hobbes is the lack of empirical data. As we do not know if the state of nature is actually bad, or if the contract ever happened, the government cannot gain its legitimacy in that way.
Answer:
"In international environmental agreements, the idea that scientific uncertainty should not be used as an excuse for inaction is known as:" <u>The precautionary approach.</u>
Explanation:
The precautionary approach is ability to asserts that the burden of proof for potentially harmful actions by industry or government rests on the assurance of safety. And that, when there are threats of serious damages, scientific uncertainty must be resolved in favor of prevention.
