I believe the answer is: <span> early learning experiences and reinforcement history.
According to skinner, the level of aggressiveness that people show is a direct result of the accumulation of their past experience when they tried to get something what they want.
People tend to show higher level of aggressiveness if the people around them constantly cater to their needs and fulfill their wishes without giving them any challenge.</span>
Answer:
No. It's not possible to fly the aircraft in this scenario.
Explanation:
According to the FAA (Federal Aviation Administration), BasicMed <em>"is an alternate way for pilots to fly without holding an FAA medical certificate as long as they meet certain requirements". </em>The FAA Extension, Safety, Security Act of 2016 (FESSA), established that the following aircraft requirements to fly under BasicMed:
- Any aircraft authorized under federal law to carry not more than 6 occupants
- Has a maximum certificated takeoff weight of not more than 6,000 poundS.
So, according to this, the aircraft don't accomplish the FAA requirements to fly under BasicMed.
<span>Hypotheses generally (although not always) follow an "If-then" format. This eliminates the first and fourth choices. Of the other two, the second choice (regarding cold weather and tires) can still be tested and verified. The third statement, regarding the end of WWII, is a statement that can't be verified to any appreciable extent and can only go on eyewitness testimony and historical testimony, so it fails the scientific method test.</span>
Answer:
Food and supplies, trade, equality, economy, army, weapons,education and navy.
Explanation: You need food, trade and supplies to sustain your people. Incase of invasions, you need an army and strategy in order to either conquer or defend against the enemy. Trade is what gives you those supplies, and it's also how your people have an stable economy. Certain weapons and strategy determine your army's strength, and to go with that, you'll need a navy to defend sea routes from pirates. (Airplanes aren't a factor in this situation since we're talking about the Ottoman empire.) Equality is one many don't mention. The Ottoman empire is very diverse. So treat people the same you'd want to be treated. Everyone's equal, so no civil revolts. Everyone under this government is a citizen. They won't turn back and betray you because of a solid foundation of trust. Your soldiers will be loyal, and your people loving. In my opinion, aside from food and water, that's one of the most important parts. Another one is education. With everyone educated, they have more potential. They can innovate and add to the empire's centuries of success. With more advancements on the way, we can be modernized and discover more. Take Genghis Khan for example. Sure he was a war-mongering Mongolian, but his reign lasted so long because of how organized his government was. He had scholars spread their wisdom, religious freedom, rights for women, a strong army, flourishing trade along the silk road, and patience. He negotiated peace and shared ideas with others. His empire flourished until it later collapsed under the weak rule of his descendants. If we do the same, we could be better.
Answer:
A boycott is the renunciation of trade with a particular person or company, or even with the country as a whole. The participants in the boycott believe that the person or company in question is behaving immorally or dishonestly. A boycott is a non-violent, voluntary and deliberate refrain from using, buying or interacting with a person, organization or state as an expression of protest, usually in the moral, social, political or environmental spheres. The boycott is intended to cause economic damage to the target or to indicate moral outrage in an attempt to force the target to change its reluctant behavior.
In turn, an import quota means a quantitative restriction on the import of a certain good. Import quotas reduce the supply of the product in the country in question, which leads to a price increase. The effect is thus the same as for a duty, and there is therefore talk of import-equivalent duty. Thus, while a boycott completely prohibits the entry of a certain good, a quota only partially limits it.