1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Rudik [331]
2 years ago
13

Which of the following was a result of the French and Indian War?

History
1 answer:
Gelneren [198K]2 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Great Britain gained alot of land in North America

Explanation:

Since the French and Indian War cost so much, other countries had to give up land so they could regain money. Although this benefited Great Britain, they ended up losing the war anyway.

You might be interested in
The programs of the New Deal offered some relief but the ______ was too low for recipients to live on comfortably.
torisob [31]
Answer: pay

The programs of the New Deal was created to offer some relief however, the pay was very low for the recipients to actually enjoy and live conveniently. It gave the government a more active role in the society. 

6 0
2 years ago
Why is oligarchy important?
dlinn [17]

OligarchyHome  Social Sciences and the Law  Political Science and Government  Political Science: Terms and ConceptsInternational Encyclopedia...International Encyclopedia...The Columbia Encyclopedia,...The Oxford Pocket Dictionary...Further reading<span>TOOLS </span>Oligarchy<span>International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences | </span>1968COPYRIGHT 2008 Thomson Gale.Oligarchy

bibliography

The word “oligarchy” and the concepts which it symbolizes originated in ancient Greece. In its basic use, the word identified one of the general forms of government recognized by the Greeks: that in which political government is conducted by a few persons or families. It was also used more narrowly, by Aristotle for example, to refer to the debased form of aristocracy, that is, to government by the few or by a faction. The term “oligarchy” was also used to refer to the small group of persons who enjoyed a monopoly of political control in oligarchic governments; the term usually had the added sense that the oligarchy ruled in its own rather than in the public interest. For Aristotle, classification of governments rested on two independent variables: the number of persons who ruled and the purposes served by their rule. Oligarchy was present when a few persons ruled for their own satisfaction.

Development of the concept. The original uses of the term were associated with particular social and political regimes and with intellectual modes of analyzing them. Typically, societies were small and traditional and rested on established classes, including a slave class. Within Greek cities citizenship status often identified a large but still minority class that could at least claim to participate in political decisions. Whatever the changes in political forms, this “upper class” was relatively stable by reason of property holding, authority relations with other classes, social position, and so on, and oligarchy could reasonably be expected to be succeeded by other known forms of government. Classical analysts found oligarchies to be endemic among ancient states, but they viewed them as unstable since they rested on military, economic, and leadership factors which were transitory as compared with the continuing forces which supported the relatively large upper classes in traditionalist societies.

In the modern view, these classical conceptions, including oligarchy and the ideas associated with it, are far too simple for effective analysis. Indeed, classical writing makes it clear that the conceptions based on the formal structure of governments were not adequate even then, in spite of the particular emphasis given to form. Greek analysts dealt with the phenomena of power, with the importance of procedures, and, of course, with the paramount role of values. These matters were merged with discussions of political form, but the elements were not clearly discriminated. The subtleties and complexities of Greek political thought do not appear to good advantage in this particular classificatory system.

6 0
3 years ago
Why did the us enter ww1 on the allied side?
Sever21 [200]
The United States entered<span> the war because of the Germans' decision to resume the policy of unrestricted submarine warfare, and the so-called "Zimmerman telegram," intercepted by the British, in which Germany floated the idea of an alliance with Mexico.

</span>
Why Did The US Enter WW1 - eNotes.com<span>https://www.enotes.com/homework-help/why-did-united-states-enter-world-war-400883</span>
3 0
2 years ago
What was one effect of the war of 1812?
Nat2105 [25]
I think its B as well

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
When the Torah is read out loud by Orthodox Jews, the name of God is usually vocalized as
Pavlova-9 [17]

Answer:

gonna go with D

Explanation:

:0

7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which sentence best explains why politicians continually need to reevaluate domestic policy? Americans are unable to agree on an
    6·2 answers
  • What key events or features of civilizations enabled people to develop writing?
    10·1 answer
  • Describe what the nearly 12.5 million African slaves experienced as they crossed the Middle Passage.
    12·1 answer
  • Which of the following statements identifies a key feature of Rome's patriarchal society?
    5·2 answers
  • Why was the "Mosquito Fleet" created during World War II?
    9·2 answers
  • Cual seria la importancia para la profesión de enfermería de la existencia de las leyes que la regulen?
    14·1 answer
  • Type the correct answer in the box. Spell the word or words correctly.
    6·2 answers
  • How did the Third Estate change the Estates General?
    12·2 answers
  • What do the KKK members believe about the world NO LINKS OR FILES PLZ
    15·2 answers
  • How has the interpretation of equality of American women changed over time?
    14·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!