Answer:
No
Explanation:
First of all, who would be the one giving the task?
Second of all, the people must be able to accept change for them to experience change.
Third of all, who would take on the task? Which country/people? Who would provide the resources, fundings, & volunteers to help "improve" the world.
Fourth, what kind of improvements are we talking about? Is it really beneficial, or does it just help with foreign government agendas?
Fifth, would there be any "extra's" that those parts of the world have to take on? Would they be called upon later on to help even when they cannot? Help usually have strings attached, and they would force obligation on the beneficiary to return the favor at a later time.
Of course, if the parts of the world wants to be improved, and there is the resources and funds to do so, then yes, Roosevelt is right in "improving" those parts of the world.
~
Answer:
he led the triumphal Marignano expedition,
Explanation:
Of the restrictions placed on the presidency by the War Powers Act.
The WPA prevents the president from authorizing relations to war without the approval of congress.
Answer:
The correct answer is: B. Criticize more.
Explanation:
To nit-pick is to unnecessarily criticize unimportant details that do not change the intended meaning of the original sentence.
For example, if someone is talking about an event that took place "in the 90's" and someone barges in to correct the first person and tell them that "in reality, it took place in 1992", that is nit-picking.
