Answer:
No, because freedom gives people the right for their voice of opinion to be heard.
Answer:
The answer is "Behavioralism."
Explanation:
"Behaviorialism" (in Political Science) is a methodological approach that prospered in the 1950s.
<em>Behavioralists</em> were consistent in directing the political world towards a more scientific direction. In order to explain the political and social behavior of people, <u>the scientists used mathematical or statistical models, such as data or other quantitative descriptions.</u> It disregarded intuition and other non-quantitative means, such as philosophy.
Statistical relationships were considered in evaluating the variables (independent and dependent). For example, a behavioralist may say that people in the city prefer to eat fast food, while people in the rural area prefer to eat home-cooked dishes according to a detailed data that they have gathered (and not according to intuition or ideologies).
Answer:
b. Being confirmed by the Senate
Explanation:
Regarding the selection process for all federal judges, Article II of the U.S. Constitution states the following:
<em>... and he </em><em>(The President) shall nominate, and by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, shall appoint</em><em> ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls, </em><em>judges</em><em> </em><em>of the Supreme Court</em><em>, and all other officers of the United States, whose appointments are not herein otherwise provided for, and which shall be established by law.</em>
Therefore, in order for a person to become a federal judge, they first have to be appointed by the President (who has to take into account the Senate's advice), and then they have to be confirmed by the Senate. This selection process is a clear example of how the Checks and Balances system work in the U.S., in which each branch of the government has the power to oversee, check and limit the other branches.
Answer:
America and Mexico tried to purchase California
