Answer:
apart from using the hoc to predict the college students gpa, some other variables can be used
1. the students intelligent quotient
2. ability to remember
3. study time
4. gym practice
Step-by-step explanation:
<u>1. the students intelligent quotient</u>
<u>gpa</u><u> </u>has a positive relationship with iq. they are both directly related. The more the iq of a a student, the greater is his ability to understand and have a good gpa. the slope will therefore be positive and be in an upward direction.
2. <u>ability to remember</u>
the gpa of students who have a good ability to remember but do not have a good grasp of the subject may not be high. the slope would be in a slightly upward direction
3. <u>study time</u>
gpa and practice have a positive relationship. the more a student studies, the more likelihood exists of having a better gpa. the slope would be upward bound.
4. <u>gym</u><u> </u><u>practice</u>
gpa and gym practice are not related so the slope would be in a downward direction.
when interpreting the direction of relationship after carrying out such an analysis, it is useful to watch out for the accompanying signs of the variables. if the sign of the beta coefficient is positive then a positive relationship with the dependent variable exists.
X = 1/2 ( If the 2 is not an <span>exponent)
</span>x = -7/2 ± √61/2 ( if 2 is the exponent)
Hoped I helped.
A. quadrant 2
b. quadrant 4
c. quadrant 3
He first two are relatively easy. f(x-2) shifts it sideways (2 to the right in this case) f(x) -2 shifts it straight down (by 2)
f(2x) means replace x with 2x in the original 4(2x + 1)^2 − 3 if you factor out the 2 from the square root you get 4*sqr(2) ( x + ½)^2 - 3 which is now in the form a ( x -h)^2 + k the vertex is now at (-½, -3) (it used to be at (-1,-3) the "a" has gotten bigger, which makes the parabola "skinnier" (it goes up faster)
2•f(x) becomes 2*( 4(x + 1)2 − 3 ) = 8 (x+1)^2 -6 where is the vertex now? is this parabola fatter or skinnier than the original f(x) ?
