Answer:
what is the question? message me when you have a resonse to this
Explanation:
Answer:
When describing the forced removal of the Native Americans to lands west of the Mississippi River, this removal was a “benevolent policy of the government.” In order to answer this question, I will give you some ideas to consider as you develop your answer.
First, you need to consider how the Native Americans and the American people viewed these policies. Generally, Native Americans resisted these policies that required them to relocate. In some instances, they had signed agreements or treaties with the government
Explanation:
Explanation:
Europe in the nineteenth century drew on immense new resources created by the Industrial Revolution to underpin its expansion.
• European states were more powerful in the nineteenth century and were able to field more military resources in their imperialist competition with each other.
• To a greater extent than before, in the nineteenth century Europe enmeshed other parts of the world in networks of trade, investment, and sometimes migration. This ultimately generated a new world economy.
• Unlike the early modern period, in the nineteenth century European expansion brought with it a new culture of modernity—its scientific rationalism and technological achievements, its belief in a better future, and its ideas of nationalism, socialism, feminism, and individualism
<span>Under current economic models, corporations are globalized, You can communicate with someone in China as if you're talking to your next door neighbor. If the US were to remain isolated from other nations, it would negatively impact trade that has become a part of our daily lives - for everything from rice to oil to silicon. Trade is what drives economies and policy. To maintain and improve quality of life, which, in my opinion, should be the goal of any civilization, it must take into account globalization. To not follow this policy would make life as we know it extremely difficult to sustain. At the same time, necessity is the mother of invention. If we shut out ourselves from fellow civilizations, we may soon discover a new energy source; but we can look at one current example of a country that has shut out all other countries - North Korea. I don't know if the citizens are truly happy there, I assume not, from what I've heard of the people who try to escape, and it seems that not allowing your citizens basic medical needs which are available everywhere else in the world, but instead you let them suffer (National Geographic has a documentary on one such topic), this seems completely inhumane.
At any rate, this is not a black and white issue, there are many pieces to the puzzle that must be addressed to let us know if this policy would be beneficial to the citizens of the country. Many policies need to be put into place and maky problems must be solved in order to maintain a happy population.</span>
