2 years ago

Find MQ in parallelogram LMNQ .

Mathematics

1 answer:

Liula [17]2 years ago

8 0

Answer:

MQ = 16.4

By the Parallelogram Diagonals Theorem , MP = PQ

So MQ = 2 · MP

Step-by-step explanation:

Parallelogram Diagonals Theorem

The diagonals of a parallelogram bisect each other, i.e. they divide each other into two equal parts.

P is the point of intersection of the diagonals.

Therefore, MP = PQ and LP = PN

If MP = 8.2, then PQ = 8.2

⇒ MQ = 8.2 + 8.2 = 16.4

You might be interested in

A dentist polls his patients and finds that 83 percent brush their teeth at least twice a day, 47 percent floss daily, and 19 pe

ella [17]

Answer: 23%

Step-by-step explanation: just is rate me good bye

7 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

a(x+b)=4x+10 in the equation above a and b are constants. if the equation has infinitely many solutions for X, what is the value

xeze [42]

Answer:

$b= \frac{5}{2}$

Step-by-step explanation:

Given

$a(x+b)=4x+10\\ax+b= 4x+10\\$

Now we know that system has infinite solution for x

$\frac{a_1}{a_2}=\frac{b_1}{b_2}$

in above equation.

$a_1=a, a_2=4, b_1=ab,b_2=10\\$

∴ $\frac{a}{4}=\frac{ab}{10}\\\therefore b=\frac{10\times a}{4\times a}=\frac{5}{2}$

7 0

2 years ago

This is algebra 1 math problem f (×)=2/5x+10

Alina [70]

To find the inverse, interchange the variables and solve for y.

f^−1(x)=−25+5x/2

3 0

3 years ago

NO LINKS HELP PLEASE PLEASE EXPLAIN

Iteru [2.4K]

Answer: 1,278

Step-by-step explanation: 2(18x18)+2 1/2(18x14)

p.e.m.d.a.s. 18x18= 324 18x14= 252

2x324= 648 2.5x252=630

648+630 =1,278

4 0

2 years ago

"let v = r 2 with the usual addition and scalar multiplication defined by k(u1, u2) = (ku1, 0). determine which of the five axio

expeople1 [14]

Let $\mathbf u\in\mathbb R^2$ , where

$\mathbf u=(u_1,u_2)$

and let $k\in\mathbb R$ be any real constant.

Given this definition of scalar multiplication, we can see right away that there is no identity element $e$ such that

$e\mathbf u=\mathbf u$

because

$e\mathbf u=e(u_1,u_2)=(eu_1,0)\neq(u_1,u_2)=\mathbf u$

5 0

3 years ago