The methods that show the property sheet is on the form tools design tab, in the Tools group, click property sheet and press the F4 function.
<h3>What is a property sheet?</h3>
A property sheet refers to the window that allows the user to view and edit the properties of an item.
The method that shows the property sheet is on the form tools design tab in the Tools group, click the property sheet and press the F4 function key.
Therefore, B, and D are the correct option.
Learn more about the property sheet here:
brainly.com/question/14802439
#SPJ1
Answer:
expected return is 15.8%
portfolio beta is 94.5%
Explanation:
a. EXPECTED RETURN: to calculate the the expected return of, we simply multiply each of the stock percentage by its expected return and then sum it up. thus we have
0.2×0.16 + 0.3×0.14 + 0.15×0.2 + 0.25×0.12 + 0.1×0.24= 0.158
Multiply the result by 100% yields 15.8%
B. PORTFOLIO BETA: to calculate the portfolio beta, we simply multiply the weighted average of the stock percentage by the portfolio beta. thus we have;
0.2×1 + 0.3×0.85 + 0.15×1.2 + 0.25×0.6 + 0.1×1.6= 0.945
multiply the result by 100% yields 94.5%
Answer: Critical Design Review
Explanation:
A Critical Design Review is referred to as a review that's fine in order o ensure that a system can be able to move into fabrication, and test and also ensure that the stated performance requirements are met.
The approved detail design resulting from the critical design review serves as a basis for making the decision to begin production.
A national health<span> insurance </span>system<span>, or single-payer </span>system<span>, in which a single government entity acts as the administrator to collect all </span>health care<span> fees, and pay out all </span>health care<span> costs. Medical services are publicly financed but not publicly provided. Canada, Denmark, Taiwan, and Sweden </span>have<span> single-payer </span>systems<span>.</span>
(12-6)/12 gives you the growth rate *over five years* (115%)
divide that by 5 and you get an average rate of 23% growth per year.
If we’re rounding, yes, that statement is correct. Otherwise, growth over five years doubled because there was a growth of 115% and year-over-year growth was 23%.