Scientists from different fields are trying to understand how the global climate is reacting to the changes caused in nature, an
d by human activities. They have come up with conflicting interpretations. Which of these is the most likely outcome of differences in interpretations made by scientists on the issue of global climate? All old ideas would be discarded.
When scientists have conflicting interpretations of something, the best thing to do is to start scientific experiments to confirm or deny the different hypotheses about it. The possible point of this is that from the conflicting ideas between a group of scientists and from the different experiments new ideas will be formed and tested that will allow the establishment of a concrete and accurate conclusion on a certain subject, in which case the differences will form a conclusion about how the global climate is causing changes in nature.
White blood cells are also known as Leukocytes. (which is where the name Leukemia came from) They help protect the body from illnesses and foreign invaders by engulfing and destroying them. If the body cannot create enough white blood cells, then there are less cells to fight off infection.
Benefits of fire = 1. Natural 2. Healthy ecosystem Benefits of managing forests = 1. Restore ecosystem Health 2. Improve habitat quality What is a prescribed fire = managed fires to intentionally clear out heavy vegetation
