Define judicial activism and judicial restraint. Explain the reasons that judges would exercise

History

1 answer:

Gelneren [198K]2 years ago

6 0

Answer:

Judicial restraint

Judicial restraint is a judicial interpretation that recommends favoring the status quo in judicial activities; it is the opposite of judicial activism. Aspects of judicial restraint include the principle of stare decisis; a conservative approach to standing and a reluctance to grant certiorari; and a tendency to deliver narrowly tailored verdicts, avoiding "unnecessary resolution of broad questions."

Explanation:

You might be interested in

Summarize the scientific Revolution. What is it?

bagirrra123 [75]

The scientific revolution, which emphasized systematic experimentation as the most valid research method, resulted in developments in mathematics, physics, astronomy, biology, and chemistry. These developments transformed the views of society about nature.

7 0

3 years ago

Which famous poet contributed to the Golden Age of Islam?

icang [17]

<span> Omar Khayyam is the answer</span>

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

2 points

Sergio [31]

The answer is B griot

5 0