1 year ago

Define judicial activism and judicial restraint. Explain the reasons that judges would exercise

History

1 answer:

Gelneren [198K]1 year ago

6 0

Answer:

Judicial restraint

Judicial restraint is a judicial interpretation that recommends favoring the status quo in judicial activities; it is the opposite of judicial activism. Aspects of judicial restraint include the principle of stare decisis; a conservative approach to standing and a reluctance to grant certiorari; and a tendency to deliver narrowly tailored verdicts, avoiding "unnecessary resolution of broad questions."

Explanation:

You might be interested in

Cultural Rights Vs. Women’s Rights: How do we strike a balance?

Vladimir [108]

Depending on the culture and that's how they view women's rights. That's where the balance comes in.

4 0

2 years ago

IS 99 POINTS!!!!

cluponka [151]

The question is asking which <span>was NOT an impact of World War II on the daily lives of Washington citizens, and the correct answer is: </span><span>Citizens worked in the same jobs they always had.

</span>

6 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Which statements are examples of Charlemagne’s achievements?

castortr0y [4]

Answer:b and c

Explanation:

I took the quiz and got it right

3 0

2 years ago

Whose murder in 1954 led to a growth in awareness of the plight of black Americans in the south?

galina1969 [7]

Answer:

i thinks its Emmitt Till im not certain tho

Explanation:

3 0

2 years ago

Please help no links or will get reported .

Radda [10]

Answer:

Explanation:

7 0

2 years ago