All categories

2 years ago

Measuring performance relative to planned objectives and standards is part of:.

Business

1 answer:

oksian1 [2.3K]2 years ago

6 0

Measuring performance relative to planned objectives and standards is part of controlling.

<h3>What is controlling?</h3>

Controlling helps to manage, supervise or oversee a given task or assignment.

It helps to measure how far or well a given task has been done relative to the target.

Therefore, Measuring performance relative to planned objectives and standards is part of controlling.

Learn more on controlling here,

brainly.com/question/25453419

You might be interested in

1. Consider an economy with a population of 100,000 households. 60 percent of households reportan annual income of $25,000 ("low

Leona [35]

Answer:

The total income earned by households in this economy is:

$4,700,000,000

Explanation:

a) Data and Calculations:

Household population = 100,000

Low earners = 60% with annual income of $25,000 each

Mid earners = 30% with annual income of $70,000 each

High earners = 10% with annual income of $110,000 each

60% of the population = 60,000 (100,000 * 60%) households

30% of the population = 30,000 (100,000 * 30%) households

10% of the population = 10,000 (100,000 * 10%) households

Total income earned by the households:

Low earners = 60,000 * $25,000 = $1,500,000,000

Mid earners = 30,000 * $70,000 = 2,100,000,000

High earners = 10,000 * $110,000 = 1,100,000,000

Total income earned in the economy $4,700,000,000

3 0

3 years ago

Helen taylor works 10 hours a day for 4 days a week, while her colleagues work 8 hours a day for 5 days a week. helen is utilizi

Kipish [7]

<span>Helen taylor works 10 hours a day for 4 days a week, while her colleagues work 8 hours a day for 5 days a week. helen is utilizing a flexible work schedule option known as the compressed workweek.Generally compressed work week means a work course of action where a standard week's worth of work is lessened to less than five days, and employees make up the full number of hours per-week by working longer hours.In some situations Elective work course of action where a standard week's worth of work is lessened to less than five days, and representatives make up the full number of hours per-week by working longer hours.In some situations for meeting deadlines compressed workweek may occur every other week.</span>

8 0

3 years ago

The product-variety externality is associated with the A. opportunity cost of firms exiting a monopolistically competitive indus

Viefleur [7K]

Answer:

The correct answer is letter "D": consumer surplus that is generated from the introduction of a new product.

Explanation:

Externalities are defined as the effects passed on third parties as a result of the actions of another individual or organization even if the third party has nothing to do with the operations of the individuals or entities. Externalities can be positive or negative.

The product-variety externality is an example of a positive externality. The product-variety externality takes place when a new product is introduced in the market generating a consumer surplus. Thus, end-users benefit from the variety of products available in the market even if that represents more competition for companies.

4 0

3 years ago

Investment in depreciable equipment$560,000 Annual net cash flows $82,000 Life of the equipment 16years Salvage value$0 Discount

katrin [286]

Answer:

The correct option is the last one,6.8 years

Explanation:

The payback period is the length of time it takes for an investor to realize the initial investment in a project,in simple terms, it is the time horizon wherein the project pays back the capital investment locked in it.

After the payback period,the project begins with return on investment phase,a phase where cash flows received are excess over and above the initial capital outlay.

Payback=initial investment/annual cash inflow

initial investment is $560,000

annual net cash flow is $82,000

payback period=$560,000/$82,000=6.8 years

4 0

3 years ago

You are considering an investment in a mutual fund with a 4% load and an expense ratio of 0.5%. You can invest instead in a bank

irakobra [83]

Answer:

a. r > 8.69%

b. r > 7.225

Explanation:

Missing question <em>"b. hat annual rate of return must the fund portfolio earn if you plan to invest for 6 years to be better off in the fund than in the CD?"</em>

<em />

Mutual fund wealth index after N years = (1 - front load)*(1+r-expenses)^N

CD wealth index after N years = (1+rate)^N

a. Investment for 2 years

(1 - front load)*(1+r-expenses)^N = (1+rate)^N

(1 - 0.04)*(1+r-0.005)^2 = (1+0.06)^2

0.96*(1+r-0.005)^2 = 1.1236

(1+r-0.005)^2 = 1.17041667

<em>We remove square from both sides</em>

(1+r-0.005) = 1.17041667^(1/5)

(1+r-0.005) = 1.08185797

r = 1.08185797 - 1 + 0.005

r = 0.0869

r = 8.69%

r > 8.69%

b. If investment is for 6 years

(1 - front load)*(1+r-expenses)^N = (1+rate)^N

(1 - 0.04)*(1+r-0.005)^6 = (1+0.06)^6

0.96*(1+r-0.005)^6 = 1.41851911

(1+r-0.005)^6 = 1.47762408

<em>We remove square from both sides</em>

(1+r-0.005) = 1.47762408^(1/6)

(1+r-0.005) = 1.06723648

r = 1.06723648 - 1 + 0.005

r = 0.07223648

r = 7.22%

r > 7.225

7 0

3 years ago