Answer:
Climate change can alter where species live, how they interact, and the timing of biological events, which could fundamentally transform current ecosystems and food webs.
Climate change can overwhelm the capacity of ecosystems to mitigate extreme events and disturbance, such as wildfires, floods, and disturbance, such as wildfires, floods, and drought.
Answer:
1. Better economy than South hence the Union had more troops to fight.
2. The Union had railroads , steamboats , roads and canals for faster transport of supplies and troops.
3. They had a bigger population that enhanced more industrial workers.
SUMMARY;
Leadership advantage.
economic stability.
larger population.
organized and established government.
they had control over resources.
The extreme temperstures are
ebruary 27.0 °C (80.6 °F) Yeysk, Krasnodar Krai
March 31.0 °C (87.8 °F) Armavir, Krasnodar Krai
April 36.8 °C (98.2 °F) Armavir, Krasnodar Krai
May 38.7 °C (101.7 °F) Lake Elton, Volgograd Oblast
Whenever a research is done, you must reject or accept a null hypothesis (the one you consider is not correct) or your work hypothesis (the theory you think is must probably accurate or close to the truth) usually, when performing a research, you will not always obtain positive or statistically significant results, that validate your hypothesis. Is actually, not unusual that extremes (or extraordinary results) come out (unexpected for several reasons: incorrect size of the sample, improper selection of the subjects- a bias- lack of correct determination of the variable measured or failure to determine the type of the variable-numerical, categorical, ratio,etc-)
Positive or negative results are yet, results whether they prove or reject your hypothesis. Failing to establish a scientific hypothesis does not necessarily mean that they did something wrong, it just says that the hypothesis tested does not approach correctly to the epistemological truth (ultimately, any research is only a mere approximation to reality). Therefore, when two scientists deny sharing<em> unusual results</em>, they are acting unethically, hiding results that can mean something from a different point of view.
reference
Nicholson, R. S. (1989). On being a scientist. Science, 246(4928), 305-306.
