The voter’s perceptions of the economy affected the 2012 presidential election in the most significant way - the majority voted in favor of President Obama to help him secure his second term.
Voters assess the state of the economy under the different candidates which helps them determine their preferred voting candidate.
The aim is to select the candidate under whom the economy would perform better.
However, it depends on the percentage of the mass who blame the presidential candidate for the declining economy as opposed to those who did not.
The presidential elections of 2012 was close to an economic crisis - three years after the recession. President Obama’s upward trajectory to help recover after one of the worst economic crises, secured his second win.
Therefore, the dynamics of voting remain affected by the economic condition and hereby stay relevant to the vote choice.
Hence, the voter’s perceptions of the economy secured Barack Obama his second term during the presidential elections from 2012 to 2017.
To know more about how economy can affect elections, refer to the link provided - brainly.com/question/3927361
#SPJ4
Answer:
Janice is asked by her daughter to help with making a list of all the presidents of the United States for a school project. In order for Janice to help her daughter, she will need to rely on <u>crystallized</u> intelligence.
Explanation:
Crystallized intelligence : This type of intelligence is based upon facts and rooted in experiences. As we age and accumulate new knowledge and understanding, crystallized intelligence becomes stronger. As long as opportunities for learning are available, crystallized intelligence can increase indefinitely during a person's life. For example, vocabulary knowledge is known to increase in college professors throughout their life span.
Hence, In order for Janice to help her daughter, she will need to rely on <u>crystallized</u> intelligence.
Answer:
When the child is moving the most they should reach maxium kinetic energy.
Explanation:
When their stopped it will be potential.
PLEASEEE
Mark BRainliest
Answer:
B. predisposition
Explanation:
trust me!! i got a 100 on the quiz :)
Answer:
Inductive
Explanation:
Inductive reasoning is the opposite of deductive reasoning. Inductive reasoning creates wide conclusions from certain observations, just as in this case study, the rate of murder. Majorly, there is data (in our case study- This pattern holds true, even when she controls for population differences (so it is not due to more people living in northern cities)), then generalizations are made from the data (from our case study--greater "culture of violence" in the south produces higher murder rates). This is often referred to as inductive logic, according to Utah State University.
"In inductive inference, there is a shift from an actual one to general form. We make many notations, create a pattern, make a conclusion, and create an explanation or a theory," Wassertheil-Smoller told Live Science. "In science, there is a constant interconnection among inductive inference (based on notations) and deductive inference (based on theory), until we arrive in proximity to the 'truth,' by not just approaching but to be able to prove with total certainty."
Another instance of inductive logic is, "when a person pulls out a coin from a bag and it happened to be a penny. On reaching out the second time, the person also picked a penny, and at the third time, a third coin from the bag is also a penny. It will bring the person to make a generalization that all the coins in the bag are pennies."
Even if the entire premises are correct in a statement, inductive reasoning permits for the generalization to be false. Another example "Semai is a grandmother. Semai is bald. Therefore, all grandmothers are bald." The generalization does not comply logically from the statements.
