Answer: no
Explanation: if the government didn't protect the peoples rights then the people can throw out the government and replace a new and better one to the peoples liking since its well known in the constitution that the people have the power to do so, like the magna carta where the government (king) at the time abused power and gave cruel and usual punishments. The government cannot go against the people or take there rights (John Locke - the social contract) its also why we have our bill of rights to secure our rights for the government does not violate us and rule of law where nobody is above the law. The government would only go to great lengths if it was a issue the people suggest they look into, other then that the government does not go to far lengths for there citizens unless they get called out for it.
Well seeing that the colonists were beaten so badly by the British at Bunker Hill, if they had surrendered, lives probably would've been saved
The girls who have grown up in paternalistic families are more fearful of legal sanctions whereas the boys have more offensive behavior.
<h3>What is the family structure?</h3>
The relatives and members that togetherly form a family are said to have a family structure. They can be a single or nuclear family, joint family, step-family, and many more.
A paternalistic family is the one where the person has influenced another person in a fatherly way against their own will or consent. The males in these families have dominating and offensive nature in comparison to the girls. They do not allow to go outside for working in a job or occupation of their own interest due to which they are not able to get socialized.
Therefore, the girls who belong to the paternalistic family do not get socialized because of legal sanctions, in contrast to the boys who have offending nature.
Learn more about the paternalistic family in provided link:
brainly.com/question/6194841
#SPJ1
Giuseppe Garibaldi is best known for his military leadership in the unification of Italy in the 19th century.
Answer:
A person in a communal relationship with another is more likely to be concerned with the <em>non contingent </em>effect of helping. While a person in an exchange relationship with another is more likely to be concerned with the <em>contingent</em> effect of helping others.
Explanation:
<em>Communal relationships</em> are closely knitted relationships, such that occurs within family and partners. In a communal relationship, helping does not come with future expected benefits (non contingent) . Giving is done with an objective of ensuring the other person's need is met.
In an <em>Exchange relationship</em>, the effect of helping comes with future benefits of repayments. Giving is done with an objective of some future repayment. This type of relationship occurs among business partners. 'If person A does person B a favor today, it is expected that person B will repay the favor to person A in future.
