<em>Their culture changed drastically in the early 16th century, when European newcomers introduced them to the horse. </em>The horse enabled them to travel much faster across greater distances which meant that they could follow and hunt buffalo more easily. Since buffalo was the main resource, not only for food but also for tents and clothing which were made from its skin, as well as for domestic objects made from its bones, this revolutionized their culture, enabling them to live more securely. By the 18th century they became full-fledged nomadic horse cultures and the horse became a central symbol of their lives. Aside from being appreciated because of the utility and the lifestyle it made possible, the horse also became a symbol of social prestige and a cultural object, referenced in stories and songs from the time.
Hello. This question is incomplete. The full question is:
Which of the following is NOT true of the brain's association areas?
Most intelligent animals have larger association areas.
Lower-level species have smaller association areas.
The association areas link sensory information with stored memories.
More intelligent animals have smaller association areas.
Answer:
More intelligent animals have smaller association areas.
Explanation:
The size of brain structures, including brain associations, is not the best way to determine animals that are more intelligent or not. Although most intelligent animals have larger brain associations, this is not a rule of nature. The size of the brain associations is very much related to the size of the brain structure itself, which is very much related to the size of the body structure and the composition of the organism. Although, in general, we cannot say that more intelligent animals have smaller areas of association.
Answer:
very state has an equal voice in the Senate, while representation in the House of Representatives is based on the size of each state's population.
There ya go :)
The church was taking money for selling people pieces of paper that said that their sins were forgiven. Luther believed that sins being forgiven depends on god and your repentance and that such a thing cannot be bought with money and that the Church was just taking all the wealth for itself.
